SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David L. Carter who wrote (10029)3/3/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: zurdo  Respond to of 27722
 
Thank you for your advice...



To: David L. Carter who wrote (10029)3/3/1999 5:29:00 PM
From: Lynn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27722
 
David,

What appears to have been going on here is a clash between a short term trader and long term holders. If people on this thread were in and out of NAVR, Anthony's suggestion would be one thing. Since people here are not, his advice--which is geered for the quick trader--is annoying.

He seems to be gloating that people should have gotten out when he said so. Please note that he has **never** posted to the thread before today. Given this, why should people who have never heard of him before listen to him?

I'm not a short term trader and most others here aren't either. I do not want the investment advice of a short term trader, who'se perspective and time frames are very different.

I am not questioning your assessment of Anthony as a person to trust. For short calls, maybe he is. I have no idea. All I do know is that his time frame for stocks is obviously different from most of us here.

Lynn



To: David L. Carter who wrote (10029)3/3/1999 5:59:00 PM
From: Von And  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27722
 
I agree with the track record. The man does call'em right on. It's hard however to admire someone so cocky, even if he is good. He covered at $15 13/16, however. He says it's going lower, but until he shorts again, he's not confident enough to risk his record on it.



To: David L. Carter who wrote (10029)3/4/1999 12:04:00 AM
From: zora  Respond to of 27722
 
David,

You can't protect something you don't have.

"is to protect his integrity".

zora


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News