Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (53733)	3/3/1999 9:12:00 PM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Riley, A multiple choice question: A) You Lied. B) You are incredibly stupid. Which is it? My bet is that you originally got suckered into this thing but soon found out that it wasn't the company that you thought it was (how could you not???). You then became willing to do almost ANYTHING to keep from losing your money which ultimately brought enough attention to the company that the SEC halted trading and you lost everything. Is that about it? TC

To: Riley G who wrote (53733)	3/3/1999 9:48:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

I don't see the point in your return to SI in order to lie again. Were you missing the spotlight ? You're still playing the same old games you always played, you have not responded to perfectly reasonable questions asked by Kenny, Daddy etc. There was a great deal of publically available information then that proved this was a scam. You chose to ignore that and harass those who presented it to the thread. Your abuse of Mike Kugler is but one instance of your tactics. Amongst your followers you would ridicule them, shun them, throw them off your e-mail list and threaten to report them to authorities for disagreeing with you. The information that was publically available but which you chose to ignore was in ample supply. The Hialeah plant was closed. There were no contracts with suppliers, the Nicagraguan plant was repossessed. The Ten Sleep facility was idle, not active. RMCW was not a distributor of Pepsi Cola. RMCW in fact was not being distributed at all. There was no contract with Taiwan for water. The Pilar de Caribe was underwater not sailing the ocean delivering goods. There were numbers for you to contact, there was a newspaper article about the Ten Sleep facility, the mayor of Ten Sleep, the owner of the Hialeah plant, the harbormaster in Jamaica were all available for verification. In addition the lies about the TA's could have been verified. You had to know that promoters were paid, because you knew Zapara was a promoter. Hazlet Newsletter, Stocks for Tomorrow and SGA Goldstar were all newsletters who accepted payment for their recomendations as was Equities the magazine you claim to have read and believed. Who do you think believes that you didn't know this was a scam ? Now you claim that you were not responsible for others being in this situation. When things were going your way you took full credit for 99% of those who were in the stock. "The reason that 99% of you are in this cartel is because I formed it on Aug. 7th, 1997 when the stock was at .19 to .22 cents a share. I uncovered this diamond in the rough and built this cartel with the help of everyone on the list. But the true reason you are here is because of the way we cartel members at the bottom worked at buying all the shares we could and at any price. We took this company up from the ashes of the MM doom into a company that wants to be on AMEX" >>If you continue to use the term that I am LYING, then I will have to deal with you on a more personal and CIVIL level.<< I'll alert the media and have my gun ready when your process server shows up (wink). (For those in the "audience" who may not know, Mork served Riley in a civil lawsuit and Riley answered the door with a gun in his hand )

To: Riley G who wrote (53733)	3/3/1999 11:21:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Well the last time I heard, people with said information trade on that information and MAKE money, and most inside information pans out... Someone really should try to work up statistics on this. I'd guess that at least as far as BB stocks are concerned it's not true at all. In fact, trading on insider information, obtained at first or second hand, is probably how most people LOSE money on these stocks. But as I keep trying to explain to Pugs, just because it's incorrect insider info doesn't mean it's not insider info. This is why calling the company and believing everything they tell you is an extremely poor idea.