Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (1147)	3/3/1999 10:01:00 PM
From: Tom Cat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

Eric, Bad boy, giving bad advice to people with such a low IQ....shame on you. no wonder he died of heart attack after shorting NWI based on your advice!!! TC

To: E. Charters who wrote (1147)	3/3/1999 10:39:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

P.S. The thread looks forward to the rambling retort! Lightning fast and nadda disappointment! I noticed that you assume one is intelligent because one sees through your bullshit! Flattery;-))))) Cognoscenti ummmmmmmmmmm sounds like a hydrothermally evolved non-magmatic high-Ni gneiss layered porphyry..... I also assume you are talking about Cagniard apparent resistivity or the resistivity calculated from orthogonal electrical and magnetic field data. In application it is given in ohm-m at period T by T\|Z\|**2, you know Z and the rest:-) Futher to a constructive discussion: PEM and TEM are pretty much the same (don't tell Crone I said that). They have different wave-forms and other hardware variations but general principles are similar. Depth of penetration is primarily related to loop size, and depth of detection is a factor of the conductor size (the smallest dimension). Survey parameters also play a role in detection (i.e. loop position, station spacing etc.). Economic Ni-sulfide orebodies can easily be detected to 300m and there is published T-EM data indicating detection beyond 500m depth. In borehole EM the rule of thumb is 200m off-hole however this is based on an economic sized body. A generalized rule might place detection distance proportional to the size of the conductive body. The ore may or may not be magnetic! Here it does not appear to be associated with magnetic anomaly however some may argue this is a function of size, and/or depth of burial. There are abundant examples of non-magnetic, very economic, massive sulfide orebodies. I think I remember one in Labrador somewhere. The Ni is in the olivine matirx in the mafic magma...NOT THE SEDIMENTS. The sediments may only provide the sulfur that when combined with the Ni-rich magmas form Ni-sulfides. It is essential to have a sulfur sources to pull the Ni out of PPB concentrations in the magma and concentrate it into percents in massive sulfide occurrences. This is not intended to support or refute the economics or potential of the NWI prospect. L8R 1King 25 years eh? EDIT: NIGHTY NIGHT zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz