SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Winstar Comm. (WCII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SteveG who wrote (10502)3/4/1999 5:25:00 AM
From: Robert Scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12468
 
I don't believe it's an issue of the media (fiber or copper). With ADSL, it's only broadband 1 way and so would be less appealing to corps. XDSL is a competitor to wireless fiber and it can come in synchronous flavors. However, I think one of the other major advantages of wireless fiber is that local, long distance and internet access can be provided over 1 link by 1 company. XDSL would most likely come from RBOC or be resold by IXC so Winstar advantage would remain from a 1 stop or price perspective depending on the competitor.



To: SteveG who wrote (10502)3/4/1999 6:05:00 AM
From: Mazman  Respond to of 12468
 
From Thursday's Investor's Business Daily...

Big Players Still On Hold In Fixed Wireless Market

Date: 3/4/99
Author: Reinhardt Krause

If it's good enough for cell phone pioneer Craig McCaw, isn't ''fixed wireless'' - a technology that sends large amounts of data over the airwaves - good enough for AT&T Corp.?

After all, AT&T paid a hefty $11.5 billion for McCaw Cellular Communications Inc. in 1994. This time, as a way into local phone markets, AT&T may want to get involved with McCaw's latest venture, Nextlink Communications Inc., or some other player in fixed wireless.

History isn't repeating itself just yet. But stay tuned, analysts say.
''As fixed wireless technology proves itself, the big guys will want it,'' said Lehman Brothers analyst William Garrahan.

Nextlink spent $833 million in January to acquire radio spectrum licenses needed to build fixed wireless networks. Nextlink joins WinStar Communications Inc., Teligent Inc. and Advanced Radio Telecom Corp. as start-ups rolling out the technology.

Still, the most-advanced types of fixed wireless systems have yet to be deployed on a large scale. Some big industry players - like AT&T - are sitting on the fence.

Fixed wireless systems use rooftop radio antennas instead of fiber-optic cables or standard copper phone lines to transmit, in much the same vein as cell phones. Unlike cell phones, though, fixed wireless systems work at higher frequencies. The systems promise to deliver Internet transmissions and data along with the voice traffic cell phones offer.

Attacking by air enables new players in local phone markets to reach office buildings and bypass the Bells' networks. Fixed wireless systems offer Bell rivals a low-cost way to hook up with small and midsize businesses, analysts say.

But getting radio spectrum is another matter. Most radio spectrum for big urban markets has been gobbled up by WinStar, Nextlink and Teligent, although AT&T does own some licenses.

If fixed wireless start-ups succeed in local phone markets, the firms could be acquired by bigger phone companies, analysts say. Possible buyers include long-distance players such as AT&T, MCI WorldCom Inc., Sprint Corp. or even an overseas carrier.

''Having big national footprints in key cities would attract quite a bit of interest,'' said Mark Kastan, analyst at Merrill Lynch & Co. ''Wireless spectrum is a key strategic asset.''

Fixed wireless networks, he adds, could work in tandem with other strategies for breaking into local phone markets. Started in 1994, Bellevue, Wash.- based Nextlink is constructing fiber-optic networks in most major U.S. cities. The company also acquired capacity on a national fiber network being built by Level 3 Communications Inc. as part of a $700 million July deal.

But Nextlink wants to use fixed wireless links in cases where it would be too expensive to lay down fiber. One of Nextlink's investments was a commitment of $695 million in cash and stock to WNP Communications Inc. of Reston, Va., for WNP's wireless licenses. WNP acquired its licenses in March 1998 for $187 million in a government auction last year.

''McCaw paid almost four times what WNP paid at an auction about nine
months earlier,'' said Danny Zito, a Baltimore-based analyst at Legg Mason Wood Walker Inc. ''That suggests people are getting more comfortable with (fixed wireless) technology.''

One reason is a new generation of network gear coming from suppliers
Northern Telecom Ltd., Lucent Technologies Inc. and Robert Bosch GmbH.
Nextlink's President George Tronsrue says that having multiple equipment vendors will drive down costs. Nextlink plans to launch its first fixed wireless system by late this year.

New York- based WinStar and Vienna, Va.-based Teligent have a head start on Nextlink. WinStar has deployed its wireless network in 30 markets, reaching 4,000 buildings. Teligent operates in 20 markets, but it's just starting out. On Monday, Teligent reported a net loss of $281 million on sales of $1 million in 1998.

Tronsrue says he's not worried. Nextlink's wireless network will be more advanced, he says.

''The generation of technology we're going to deploy will work to our
advantage,'' Tronsrue said. He adds that much of the fixed wireless market is untapped. And Nextlink has customers hooked up to its fiber-optic system in 36 cities.

But Nextlink leases phone lines from the Bells to connect 85% of its
customers to its network, Tronsrue says. Wireless links would cut the Bells out of the picture.

''Fixed wireless gives someone like Nextlink control over their own network,'' said Dan Ernst, analyst at The Strategis Group in Washington, D.C.

Building out Nextlink's new-age phone system will be costly. Rivals such as WinStar use an early version of fixed wireless called local multipoint distribution services. The high radio frequencies used by local multipoint networks require a clear line of sight between antennas.

But Nextlink and Teligent both plan an updated ''point-to- multipoint'' system using a central base station, which gathers signals from a number of surrounding rooftop antennas.

''Point-to-multipoint is far more flexible; you can blanket an area,'' said Legg Mason's Zito.

Whether Nextlink can afford any new system remains to be seen. Nextlink lost $278.3 million for fiscal 1998, or $6.26 a share, up from $129 million, or $3.91.

WinStar may have an edge by having already gained access rights to
commercial buildings. That's a time-consuming process, says WinStar
Chairman and Chief Executive William Rouhana. ''Our (radio) spectrum position is the best, and we have a lot more building rights,'' he said. ''We can quickly upgrade to point-to-multipoint.''

Buying Nextlink or WinStar could aid AT&T's foray into local service. AT&T is testing whether fixed wireless can be offered to residential customers for fast Internet access. That low-frequency project is called ''Project Angel.'' AT&T is trying to lower costs.

Analysts say AT&T may try to adapt Project Angel-type technology for the higher radio frequencies used by WinStar and others to reach commercial buildings.

AT&T owns high-frequency spectrum suitable for fixed wireless in about 300 markets.



To: SteveG who wrote (10502)3/4/1999 6:06:00 AM
From: limtex  Respond to of 12468
 
SG and all -

Try this for size - cribbed from the G* thread this morning

IBD. Big Players Still On Hold in Fixed Wireless Market

Date: 3/4/99
Author: Reinhardt Krause

If it's good enough for cell phone pioneer
Craig McCaw, isn't ''fixed wireless'' - a
technology that sends large amounts of data
over the airwaves - good enough for AT&T
Corp.?

After all, AT&T paid a hefty $11.5 billion for
McCaw Cellular Communications Inc. in
1994. This time, as a way into local phone
markets, AT&T may want to get involved
with McCaw's latest venture, Nextlink
Communications Inc., or some other player in
fixed wireless.

History isn't repeating itself just yet. But stay
tuned, analysts say.

''As fixed wireless technology proves itself,
the big guys will want it,'' said Lehman
Brothers analyst William Garrahan.

Nextlink spent $833 million in January to
acquire radio spectrum licenses needed to
build fixed wireless networks. Nextlink joins
WinStar Communications Inc., Teligent Inc.
and Advanced Radio Telecom Corp. as
start-ups rolling out the technology.

Still, the most-advanced types of fixed
wireless systems have yet to be deployed on
a large scale. Some big industry players - like
AT&T - are sitting on the fence.

Fixed wireless systems use rooftop radio
antennas instead of fiber-optic cables or
standard copper phone lines to transmit, in
much the same vein as cell phones. Unlike
cell phones, though, fixed wireless systems
work at higher frequencies. The systems
promise to deliver Internet transmissions and
data along with the voice traffic cell phones
offer.

Attacking by air enables new players in local
phone markets to reach office buildings and
bypass the Bells' networks. Fixed wireless
systems offer Bell rivals a low-cost way to
hook up with small and midsize businesses,
analysts say.

But getting radio spectrum is another matter.
Most radio spectrum for big urban markets
has been gobbled up by WinStar, Nextlink
and Teligent, although AT&T does own some
licenses.

If fixed wireless start-ups succeed in local
phone markets, the firms could be acquired
by bigger phone companies, analysts say.
Possible buyers include long-distance players
such as AT&T, MCI WorldCom Inc., Sprint
Corp. or even an overseas carrier.

''Having big national footprints in key cities
would attract quite a bit of interest,'' said
Mark Kastan, analyst at Merrill Lynch & Co.
''Wireless spectrum is a key strategic asset.''

Fixed wireless networks, he adds, could
work in tandem with other strategies for
breaking into local phone markets. Started in
1994, Bellevue, Wash.- based Nextlink is
constructing fiber-optic networks in most
major U.S. cities. The company also acquired
capacity on a national fiber network being
built by Level 3 Communications Inc. as part
of a $700 million July deal.

But Nextlink wants to use fixed wireless links
in cases where it would be too expensive to
lay down fiber. One of Nextlink's investments
was a commitment of $695 million in cash
and stock to WNP Communications Inc. of
Reston, Va., for WNP's wireless licenses.
WNP acquired its licenses in March 1998 for
$187 million in a government auction last
year.

''McCaw paid almost four times what WNP
paid at an auction about nine months earlier,''
said Danny Zito, a Baltimore-based analyst at
Legg Mason Wood Walker Inc. ''That
suggests people are getting more comfortable
with (fixed wireless) technology.''

One reason is a new generation of network
gear coming from suppliers Northern
Telecom Ltd., Lucent Technologies Inc. and
Robert Bosch GmbH.

Nextlink's President George Tronsrue says
that having multiple equipment vendors will
drive down costs. Nextlink plans to launch its
first fixed wireless system by late this year.

New York- based WinStar and Vienna,
Va.-based Teligent have a head start on
Nextlink. WinStar has deployed its wireless
network in 30 markets, reaching 4,000
buildings. Teligent operates in 20 markets,
but it's just starting out. On Monday, Teligent
reported a net loss of $281 million on sales of
$1 million in 1998.

Tronsrue says he's not worried. Nextlink's
wireless network will be more advanced, he
says.

''The generation of technology we're going to
deploy will work to our advantage,'' Tronsrue
said.

He adds that much of the fixed wireless
market is untapped. And Nextlink has
customers hooked up to its fiber-optic system
in 36 cities.

But Nextlink leases phone lines from the Bells
to connect 85% of its customers to its
network, Tronsrue says. Wireless links would
cut the Bells out of the picture.

''Fixed wireless gives someone like Nextlink
control over their own network,'' said Dan
Ernst, analyst at The Strategis Group in
Washington, D.C.

Building out Nextlink's new-age phone
system will be costly. Rivals such as WinStar
use an early version of fixed wireless called
local multipoint distribution services. The high
radio frequencies used by local multipoint
networks require a clear line of sight between
antennas.

But Nextlink and Teligent both plan an
updated ''point-to- multipoint'' system using a
central base station, which gathers signals
from a number of surrounding rooftop
antennas.

''Point-to-multipoint is far more flexible; you
can blanket an area,'' said Legg Mason's
Zito.

Whether Nextlink can afford any new system
remains to be seen. Nextlink lost $278.3
million for fiscal 1998, or $6.26 a share, up
from $129 million, or $3.91.

WinStar may have an edge by having already
gained access rights to commercial buildings.
That's a time-consuming process, says
WinStar Chairman and Chief Executive
William Rouhana.

''Our (radio) spectrum position is the best,
and we have a lot more building rights,'' he
said. ''We can quickly upgrade to
point-to-multipoint.''

Buying Nextlink or WinStar could aid
AT&T's foray into local service. AT&T is
testing whether fixed wireless can be offered
to residential customers for fast Internet
access. That low-frequency project is called
''Project Angel.'' AT&T is trying to lower
costs.

Analysts say AT&T may try to adapt Project
Angel-type technology for the higher radio
frequencies used by WinStar and others to
reach commercial buildings.

AT&T owns high-frequency spectrum
suitable for fixed wireless in about 300
markets.

(C) Copyright 1999 Investors Business Daily,
Inc.
Metadata: T NXLK WCII TGNT ARTT WCOM
FON LVLT NT LU I/4891 I/4890 E/IBD E/SN1<?I>

E/TECH