Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ian@SI who wrote (28821)	3/3/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: Stefan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Ian why profanity. Please keep it civilized and I might learn how to spell. Here is a link to the last part of this mumbo jumbo. By the way I never talked about Berkshire I mention only Buffett being out of the market. Here is the link: anasazi.umsl.edu

To: Ian@SI who wrote (28821)	3/3/1999 11:23:00 PM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Ian/all, OTOT *** for an easy introduction to "Buffettology" get the cassette tape book of the same name [your library may have it].Maria Buffett reads it and a better voice I've never heard. Gottfried

To: Ian@SI who wrote (28821)	3/3/1999 11:57:00 PM
From: Robert O	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

Ian, quite right. This is factual: Buffett has NEVER sold even one share of Berkshire stock that he owned. For quite some time now (as one might expect) 99.9999% of his net worth is Berkshire stock. To point to him now and say his leeriness of certain of today's high valuations means he no longer believes in the long-term efficacy of the equities market return ability is ludicrous. Whatever... there are some here who simply continue to "play" at not understanding the point of an argument, and I suspect by choice... at least I hope so. RO