SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ampex Corporation (AEXCA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: killybegs who wrote (6007)3/4/1999 10:00:00 AM
From: killybegs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17679
 
More new channels announced by Tv on the Web...



To: killybegs who wrote (6007)3/4/1999 10:02:00 AM
From: Michael Olds  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17679
 
Correction! I also need to learn to proofread, but the fact is I didn't catch this in my mind until this morning. On the other hand, no one else pointed this out either. Am I alone in thinking that the fact that these figures show that a very small tail is wagging this dog. . . um . . . that a very small ring (in our nose) is dragging us bulls around?

Volume figures. My apologies! The correct figures are below. The extra 0 did not alter the ratios and percentages which were the real point.

Since November 2, 1998 a total of 35,921,200 shares of AXC have changed hands.

Of that, 20,716,500 (57.67%) changed hands on days when the stock was higher than the previous day, and 11,705,700 (32.59%) changed hands on days when the stock was lower than the previous day. Ratio of: 1.77 : 1

From November 2, 1998 (when the stock price was 1) to January 28 (when the stock price was 5) 21,548,700 shares changed hands (60% of the total volume for the period between November 2, 1998 and March 2, 1999). Of that 13,333,100 (61.87%) changed hands on days when the stock was higher than the previous day, and 4,947,800 (22.96%) changed hands on days when the stock was lower than the previous day. Ratio of: 2.70 : 1

From January 28, 1999 (when the stock price was 5) to March 2, 1999 (when the stock price was 3) 14,372,500 shares changed hands (you guessed it, 40% of the total volume for the period between November 2, 1998 and March 2, 1999). Of that 7,383,400 (51.37%) changed hands on days when the stock was higher than the previous day, and 6,757,900 (47.02%) changed hands on days when the stock was lower than the previous day. Ratio of: 1.09 : 1

The way I see it, this means that as a consequence of the owners of 19% (47.02% of 40%) of the shares that have changed hands since 11/2/98 selling their shares into the descending market between January 28 and March 3, the stock price for the owners of 58% of the shares that have changed hands since 11/2/98 (those who bought in a rising market) was reduced from 5 to 3 or 40%.

That the owners of 20% of the shares that have changed hands since 11/2/98 have sold their shares into a descending market does not seem unreasonable to me. It seems unreasonable to me that the effect of this could have caused such a deterioration in the stock price in a market that was otherwise stable or heading up: in other words, the degree of damage has been exaggerated as a consequence of the greater market.

The attention of the bulls should be on the fact that the owners of 60% of the shares that have changed hands during this period have held on to their shares. A fair vote of confidence.

When the market does turn up, however, it seems reasonable to think that the up move will be more or less explosive in that the balance of power will switch disproportionately to the bulls: 4:1.



To: killybegs who wrote (6007)3/4/1999 10:09:00 AM
From: Swamp Fox  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17679
 
Reading is a must! Jubimer's point, Mr Personality's shrewdness...

<I can't comment on a lot of what you asked, Orapos, but I do appreciate the input. We are in the midst of a big hiring push to meet our growth demands and you will find the entire TV onthe WEB network of channels in a constant state of improvement with some of our new talent on board. Our live webcast market is growing *exponentially* and will be generating many new channels and advertisers. Stay Tuned.>

Another point of genius, "Cousin Eddie" only plays in multi-billion dollar markets, and this one (TVontheWEB) is growing EXPONENTIALLY...

then there is MircoNet up against EMC, NAS market place is growing exponentially. Incidentally EMC is disc tehcnology as MircoNet is disc. We have price and Technology on our side as we wade into the battle for market share. Done my due dilly on the EMC board of SI. We have a ways to go until Micronet produces revenue like EMC...

DST in Digital Broadcast markets, goverment mandated growth

R&D component technology (Marlboro Man is to integrate),

AENTV Hostages,

Reiter Assoc of web hosting, building AXC entertainment backbone...



To: killybegs who wrote (6007)3/4/1999 11:46:00 AM
From: digger  Respond to of 17679
 
Thanks for the reminder Jubimer.

I've been a bit lazy on posting lately....a lot of good posts. Ampex sure has delt us alot of distractions to keep us occupied while they are working on their "brand image"

I thought this post from Ken Santucci - Channel Manager of "The Producer's Channel" - interesting.

>>>>Posted by Ken Santucci on March 01, 1999 at 23:52:13:

There is a new program coming soon to the Producers Channel which should catch your fancy....THE GINSBURG Report So you ask who is Ginsburg....Charles Ginsburg is the AMPEX engineer who in the 50's developed the first VTR video tape recorder, CBS did the first taped show and the rest is history. So Mr. Ginsburg is my new hero and the Ginsburg report will cover a variety of video tests we'll conduct which will benefit the community of producers....

Channels eminate from a focused audience with information, products and services which can be moved in an accelerated manner to the target audience through the web system.

It really is a golden opportunity for advertisers and sponsors to reach a qualified audience.<<<<

tvontheweb.com

...WHEN WILL THE "CURSE OF THE VTR" BE LIFTED FROM AXCER'S BACKS??

still long but lazy and waiting.

Cheers,
digger