Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (75328)	3/4/1999 11:23:00 AM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Jim, all, geez, I guess nobody else besides me watched CNN NewsStand Fortune last night, which featured Intel as stock of the week. I was leery of sensationalism over the Big Brother inside and AMD taking over the worldwide chip market, but it was actually positive for Intel. Didn't hurt having Dan Miles on. <G> He said the CPU ID was no big deal (no flames, that's what he said) and bottom line on Intel stock was that they are one of the horses of the Nasdaq, along with Cisco and Microsoft. 'In 2 or 3 years, they will definitely be higher than today, maybe not straight line up , especially Intel, but they will be up.' Didn't hurt also that the alternate opinion was presented by a no-name (forget his name). <g> Actually, he said that, because of Intel's far superior manufacturing and development, they would dominate for a long long time. Tony p.s., on the left coast, no conflict of the CNN bit with the Babs-Mon show, which I caught enough of to re-confirm my opinion of the whole situation as being lower than whale excrement in importance. TV

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (75328)	3/4/1999 12:06:00 PM
From: exhon2004	Respond to of 186894

Jim: OTOT re >>Then there was the US spy for Israel they were trying to get released. Very fishy.<< I am not a conspiracy theorist and tend not to convict unless I have compelling evidence. Clinton did turn down Netenyahu's request to release Pollard, but only after the head of the CIA said he would resign if the president did so. My personal view of Clinton is that he does not understand the concept of treason. He initially reacted favorably to the request, as in "I'll see what I can do", until his advisors pulled him back down to earth. Maybe some day we'll find out how much if any damage his administration has done to national security vis a vis the Chinese and other "friendly" countries. At a minimum, his administration should take responsibility for the "atmosphere" they have created that has resulted in Hughes and Boeing engineers sharing information with the Chinese that they should not have. Regards, Greg