Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 1king who wrote (1174)	3/4/1999 12:13:00 PM
From: Eric Moriarty	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5821

Coarse grained pentladite is better than fine grained because it can dramatically increase you recoveries in the core. (NWI has coarse grained pantlandite). The importance of this, at this stage, is NOT the development of a working model of the region! I do not have your 25 years of having your face stuck in a dictionary of mining terms but I do have 7 years of grass roots exploration under my belt. From that experience I can tell you one thing (with more certainty than any of you long winded fear mongering drivvle) every geology Phd that I every met was wrong more than they are right! I worked a property in B.C where the Phd's from Canadian Goldfields had suggested a pluton was influencing the quartz vien that we were working on. They stipulated that the vein, due to the influence of this pluton, would pinch at depth and thus hold no tonnage. Goldfields panicked, picked up and left the property without spending any more money. I can tell you that the property now holds 1 million ounces gold. The average geologists with only a BSc. were more accurate in developing a model for the regional geology. (although un-economic due to current conditions.) If a little bit of knowledge can be dangerous then E.C you are a walking disaster! E.C intelligence is not the ability to talk over peoples heads but the ability to convey those thoughts in a manner that the recipient of your thoughts can understand. I appreciate the information that geo in Denver has graciously provided us. E.C you only serve to give this thread a headache. This is not because of your theories but because of the obnoxious way that you present them. If you are so smart then why do you operate you little tout sheet in a manner where you alienate the majority of your potential subscribers?

To: 1king who wrote (1174)	3/4/1999 12:32:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

I just do it to expose your staggering ignorance, core-box boy. Sure you can second guess the Nuinsco boys. They found it. But have you the balls/ability to go out and find one of your own, on theory or eminent practice? So I have done the VMS model. No doubt for one who played cards all the way through university and paid for his "degree" it suits you to be arrogant. A bsc in pipe fitting does not allow you a license to be arrogant. If you cannot discuss the topic intelligently don't denigrate, just learn. So you think the nickel is where the Inco high priests tell you eh? Well read them all then and enumerate their caveats about their own pet theories. Their magamatic model is a one legged horse standing on isoptopic ratios. The horse is lame. And you have your head up the horses ass. So who came up with the VMS model and stood the geology world on its ear with the largest copper zinc find of all time. Hint. It wasn't Sangster. You really should do more reading and learning and thinking on your own stomping ground. Then get a geology degree. Then talk. But never denigrate. Well, not until someone deserves it. EC<:-}

To: 1king who wrote (1174)	3/4/1999 12:49:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5821

All the points I made about Sudbury whose literature you have only selectively read and whose rocks you have never mapped is true. The ore deposits there were always thought to be hydrothermal. The pyroclastics, ignored by Inco, were mapped and pointed to by many authorities. All the orebodies are in basin embayments of a sea floor which continued to deposit sediments in a basin. The ore deposits are all proximal to major felsic pyroclastic events, one of which is the norite. Age dating has revealed many problems with magmatic theory but non at all with VMS. Continue with your geological education. No subsequent apology will be necessary as learning your errors is a sobering experience enough. EC<:-}