SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : eGAMES (NASDAQ: EGAM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MENSO who wrote (21)3/4/1999 2:39:00 PM
From: WHL  Respond to of 34
 
Technology tanking. Giving up on EGAM. Put this on the back burner. It will be a long wait.



To: MENSO who wrote (21)3/5/1999 5:33:00 AM
From: shortlong2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34
 
Hal9000 , I have a question for you. Did you have all the answers when you first started out ? Did you ever even stop to consider that the person asking the question might not be that experienced in the market yet ? How did you get started ? When you asked someone a question, did they tell you to go to Hell ? Or did they try and help ? In my opinion, someone who wasn't so selfish would have at least told the person where this information could be found. I don't think laziness had anything to do with the person asking the question.



To: MENSO who wrote (21)3/5/1999 2:32:00 PM
From: WHL  Respond to of 34
 
Sell! Sell! Sell! Everyone's in denial about this stock. Well, I oopsed. It didn't stop at 11:00 today. Everybody, it's still going down! The heart pounds. The cold sweat breaks out. The kid's education down the tubes. Oh, well. They didn't need shoes anyway. The portfolio approaches zero. Dang it all. How could we have gotten sucked in by a screamer like this?
:)
Hey, wait a second. It's at 16.5 x trailing earnings. It's at 12 x expected earnings using the Value Line approach (last two plus next two as projected by management). Buy, buy, buy!!!

Ok, sell it due to a bad chart- but then buy it back on good fundamentals. Oh, I'm so confused. I just don't know. Anyhow, make sure you trade it over and over and over!!! Let's see some volume in here!



To: MENSO who wrote (21)3/7/1999 1:20:00 AM
From: James Ling  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34
 
HAL, since your research is so superior to all others, please respond
to my post #96 on the other EGAM thread. Thanks HAL, I know how it
hurts you to share information.

Jay