SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (28861)3/4/1999 7:58:00 PM
From: Stefan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
I can only say on thing if you make enough predictions you are bound to be right at least once. M. Murphy has been bullish on tech. stocks at the top and at the bottom. Now tell me is he bullish at the top or at the bottom right now.<g>

We'll see though.
I totally agree with you on that. Just why you established your position and I have established mine. We both will be wrong only if it moves sideways.



To: Tony Viola who wrote (28861)3/4/1999 8:54:00 PM
From: Robert  Respond to of 70976
 
Tony --

I must respectfully disagree.

How can you say "the PC slowdown is BS"? We have seen Ingram Micro and the other big distributors warn/report horrible earnings. But you say it is just the old model of distribution -- everything is direct now. So then we have the DELL miss and the CPQ and MUEI warnings. So the problem extends to direct too. Throw in the CompUSA warning tonight, and I just wonder where all this strength is you see. Even COMS said in their warning that the problem was NOT company-specific.

You have almost every pundit on the Street worried sick about the PC Sector, but yet you are so certain that "The PC slowdown is BS." How can you be so sure? If anything, I think it is the BEARS who can claim victory on this one.

Plus, this great PIII chip is simply the PII chip with new multimedia instructions. Just like from the Pentium Pro to PII. NOT a big deal, and certainly NOT a sea change worthy of massive delays in purchases.

At the very least, you must acknowledge some uncertainty in PC land if you are at all honest in your analysis.

-- Robert



To: Tony Viola who wrote (28861)3/4/1999 9:10:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 70976
 
tony, best case scenario says that revs were up 1% name one time in history where pc revs went up only 1%. you can't? 'magine that ;-)

this isn't the same ole, same ole. my cdwc puts tell me so :-)