Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rvgent who wrote (36910)	3/5/1999 12:33:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Wrong. The President was using an underling Federal employee for a sexual plaything, at work. She was on our payroll. He is on our payroll. And for the last time: The Oval Office isn't a sexual romper-room, and it's not okay to lie about sex to a Federal Judge after you've sworn to tell the truth. Don't you get it yet? Starr wasn't investigating anything until Clinton and Lewinsky conspired to lie together in court. IMO you have no business expressing outrage over anything Lewinsky does. talk about thick skulls.

To: rvgent who wrote (36910)	3/5/1999 2:40:00 AM
From: Gary E. Johnson	Respond to of 67261

Why is the messenger the fall guy? Well, because I can get the heat off me, says the prez! The more you allow the story spinners to weave their web over your eyes, the more they will weave their web over your eyes! They have come out with some real entertaining reasons to take your eyes off the prez. People get so involved with the side shows, they excuse the main event! This man has the power to bomb people AND USED THAT POWER TO DO JUST THAT TO GET YOUR EYES OFF HIM! Why is that so hard to understand??? The evidence has piled so high, in every area of his dealings. It will not do any good to list them, but if someone wishes to, have fun. I doubt you can count that high or remember all the deeds. Start with Arkansas and bring us up to date.........I don't blame you, you don't have enough time.

To: rvgent who wrote (36910)	3/5/1999 3:06:00 AM
From: Gary E. Johnson	Respond to of 67261

One question: Is there anything that the prez could do that would cause you to want him out of office? If so please give us an idea of what that might be.

To: rvgent who wrote (36910)	3/5/1999 3:18:00 AM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

I'm sure you would have said the same about Walters and gang but you ran out of space, right. I haven't really seen the outrage toward Lewinski that you folks keep harping on. I don't buy your outrage over Starr's behavior or over anything anybody does with Monica's story. If it makes you feel justified though don't let common sense get in the way of your opinions. I haven't seen the maniac personality you keep trying to paint on Starr either. Outside of this job, which he was appointed to, he has always been considered a fair minded and well balanced individual. In fact, that is why he was appointed. Bottom line, he's the messenger, you don't like the message. You ought to be ashamed of yourself for all of the unfair attacks on him. He's a decent man just doing his job. You are a man. You are every bit entitled to stand up and expect decent treatment and representation from other men. Start acting like it. BC is lying to you still and for some reason you feel helpless to object to it. You would certainly run me into the ground if you caught me in a falsehood. You'd do it to Starr. bc is no different than any of the rest of us. Why do you feel so dependant on bc? It is only through the support of people like you, that the lying and cheating continues. Its not on the basis of public trust. Not because he is respected to stand as the highest level representive of our constitutional government. No reason what so ever except maybe your fear of conservatives. Didn't your parents ever tell you that the boogie man isn't real?