Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stiltz1 who wrote (17236)	3/4/1999 11:36:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

stiltz, you are mistaken. You have not provided any facts to this thread. Perhaps you need to look up the word 'fact' in the dictionary. Barb

To: stiltz1 who wrote (17236)	3/5/1999 12:06:00 AM
From: av8r	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Perhaps it has not occurred to you that one of the main reasons to short a stock is that there is no substance backing it. Exposing the "news", "no news today but will have some tomorrow", "facts I heard from someone who knows more than you", "train leaving…". "…to the moon". etc. bunch of BS and then labeling the stock as a POS, dog, pig, … seems reasonable to me. I guess we could call it a product-of-digestion, aromatically challenged equity, but I use Columbus style typing…(find it & land on it) so three lettered words will have to suffice. I have seen everyone ask the person who is promoting a stock to list the reasons for their opinion (100% facts that are verifiable). If this is done convincingly, you will easily see people on this thread change. I have yet to see this from any promoter. Feel free to be the first.

To: stiltz1 who wrote (17236)	3/5/1999 6:09:00 AM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Mr. stiltz. Facts are: The share count of NAVR increased by 10 Mil. between two 10-Q filings - per the respecting entries "Outstanding shares per <date>." I always have been careful enough and did not shop around "Heavy insider selling - SELL... " and such other things (on the short side). I only drew my own conclusions on market behaviour and returned to the navr thread ONLY then, when the fact about the share count has been made official and still misleading facts about the No. of outstanding NAVR shares have been posted. Again. Can you provide any FACTS why the stock price of NAVR "could soar to the 30ies." Can you provide your present assessment of NAVR company value - after an S-1 reg. Netradio has been filed. Can you do it? Best regards, C.