Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (22911)	3/5/1999 11:38:00 AM
From: Mel Spivak	Respond to of 24154

New Bill in Congress to protect kids from the net: Safe Schools Internet Act of 1999 (Introduced in the House) HR 368 IH 106th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 368 To require the installation of a system for filtering or blocking matter on the Internet on computers in schools and libraries with Internet access, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 19, 1999 Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A BILL To require the installation of a system for filtering or blocking matter on the Internet on computers in schools and libraries with Internet access, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the 'Safe Schools Internet Act of 1999'. SEC. 2. NO UNIVERSAL SERVICE FOR SCHOOLS OR LIBRARIES THAT FAIL TO IMPLEMENT A FILTERING OR BLOCKING SYSTEM FOR COMPUTERS WITH INTERNET ACCESS. (a) IN GENERAL- Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following: '(l) IMPLEMENTATION OF A FILTERING OR BLOCKING SYSTEM- '(1) IN GENERAL- No services may be provided under subsection (h)(1)(B) to any elementary or secondary school, or any library, unless it provides the certification required by paragraph (2) or (3), respectively. '(2) CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOLS- Before receiving universal service assistance under subsection (h)(1)(B), an elementary or secondary school (or the school board or other authority with responsibility for administration of that school) shall certify to the Commission that it has-- '(A) selected a system for computers with Internet access to filter or block matter deemed to be inappropriate for minors; and '(B) installed, or will install as soon as it obtains computers with Internet access, a system to filter or block such matter. '(3) CERTIFICATION FOR LIBRARIES- Before receiving universal service assistance under subsection (h)(1)(B), a library that has a computer with Internet access shall certify to the Commission that, on one or more of its computers with Internet access, it employs a system to filter or block matter deemed to be inappropriate for minors. If a library that makes a certification under this paragraph changes the system it employs or ceases to employ any such system, it shall notify the Commission within 10 days after implementing the change or ceasing to employ the system. '(4) LOCAL DETERMINATION OF CONTENT- For purposes of paragraphs (2) and (3), the determination of what matter is inappropriate for minors shall be made by the school, school board, library or other authority responsible for making the required certification. No agency or instrumentality of the United States Government may-- '(A) establish criteria for making that determination; '(B) review the determination made by the certifying school, school board, library, or other authority; or '(C) consider the criteria employed by the certifying school, school board, library, or other authority in the administration of subsection (h)(1)(B).'. (b) CONFORMING CHANGE- Section 254(h)(1)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(h)(1)(B)) is amended by striking 'All telecommunications' and inserting 'Except as provided by subsection (l), all telecommunications'.

To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (22911)	3/5/1999 11:40:00 AM
From: Mel Spivak	Respond to of 24154

Congress: Filtering technology rq'd: Solution about to hit the market: Heartsoft HTSF is about to debut such a protective browser. Look at HTSF's news. Mel

To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (22911)	3/6/1999 9:29:00 AM
From: Harvey Allen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

Judge Delays Suit Against HMO by Coma Victim's Parents By David S. Hilzenrath Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, March 6, 1999; Page E03 The judge presiding over the legal battle between a Blue Cross HMO and the family of car crash victim Alistaire Moore yesterday said the case may have to be tried "all over again." Instead of hearing closing arguments as scheduled, federal judge Thomas Penfield Jackson announced that he would reassess a jurisdictional ruling he made long before the trial began last August. "There is no point in my deciding [the case] if I do not have jurisdiction," Jackson said. washingtonpost.com

To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (22911)	3/8/1999 4:56:00 PM
From: Charles Hughes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

How bright do you have to be to see that a proposal coming from Microsofts competitors for the nature of the breakup is poisoned by the desire of those competitors to see the competition wiped out? If the competition is supporting the 'baby bills' proposal, and have really done some analysis, then that proposal is the one that is worst for MSFT. BTW, are you now working for the MSFT competition in any way? Or is this still all pro bono advice? :-) Chaz