SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Kearney who wrote (44050)3/5/1999 7:57:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 

Glenn - Here's a partial roster of early leaders:

Oracle - 1st functional relational database: today has essentially no competition in its
main product line (though some is one the way, maybe)

MSFT - Bill Gates dropped out of college to work on the the VERY 1st PC, a piece of
junk whose output consisted 16 lights that could blink on and off!!!

INTC - co-inventor of the integrated circuit; TI the other co-inventor was too enamored
of their military profits ('a la Walmart?) to put much effort into the product early on

Apple - You would have made a lot of money with Apple for 10 years: the 1st quality
home computer

Lotus - 1st great PC software product - a money machine for years

But the best is Ashton-Tate - a lousy database, but because they were 1st, they had to be
bad for 8 years before anyone could catch them


Tom,

We agree here in a sense. You chose six for your list. Three are still the leaders while three are far from being the leaders. Let's add a seventy such as CompuServe which was by far had an early lead. AOL kind of did them in. What we have is simply competition in the market place and 50% of the early leaders continue to be leaders and other fail. Your point about making money on the stock price is accurate as long as one knew in advance their stocks would climb. In hindsight we know but foresight is more difficult. The early lead never kept these firms out front. Execution is what made the difference over years.

Glenn



To: Tom Kearney who wrote (44050)3/5/1999 9:23:00 AM
From: Olu Emuleomo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Oracle - 1st functional relational database: today has essentially no competition in its
main product line (though some is one the way, maybe)


Not true!

Oracle is the leader, but MSFT is *fast* catching up.
Also, dont discount Sybase and Informix.

--Olu E.