Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (51716)	3/5/1999 11:26:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572777

Scumbria, <..idea what a "short-tick" processor is.> This is that tiny "architecture thing" our buddy Yousef failed to recognize from the "heights" of his "degree", but which provides a major frequency advantage for Intel. Regards, - Ali

To: Scumbria who wrote (51716)	3/5/1999 11:58:00 PM
From: grok	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572777

'I have no idea what a "short-tick" processor is.' This is DEC-speak. A clock cycle is called a tick. Alpha is said by its designers to be short tick because it has an extremely high clock rate but doesn't do a whole lot in a cycle. It also has a long pipeline. When StrongARM was microarchitected they went with long tick (and shorter pipe) so that they would have decent performance without such a high clock rate because they were more power sensitve. Kind of like Speed Demons vs Brainiacs that Linnley Gwennap used to talk about. Generally, short tick has won in PCs and Workstations while long tick is used for embedded.