Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tickertype who wrote (8942)	3/5/1999 12:25:00 PM
From: geep	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Ticker, Could you please expound on why you believe this to be true. I want to believe you but there has not been confirmation that even Valence has taken this step. Or are you just trying to set Larry off? It's fun to see him react,. I keep thinking that Fred slips some things in just to provoke him...it's so easy! Thanks.

To: Tickertype who wrote (8942)	3/5/1999 9:38:00 PM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27311

Ticker: LOL!! Okay, sumbody claims that sum company is restricting employee's fer fear that violations may be in the offing. Let's get real here. You and I both know that if'n there was ANYTHING about to transpire you'd see it telegraphed in volume surges, albeit in an indirect manner of Uncles, Aunts, second cousins, etc., buying the friggin' stock and daring the SEC to challenge the nature of the buying. Yet, VLNC trading is muddling around sideways down, indicating the market, which tends to telegraph ANY possibility, discounts ALL of these "yer not permitted" rumors This is not to say it ain't possible. It's just that I've yet to see ONE data point that provides corroboration, eh? So unless anyone can provide this me thinks folks should shut up about it and simply await a corporate VLNC pronouncement. It's as simple as that. HEH! John~