Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : QGLY - Funny Name Great Product. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John A Satriano who wrote (8824)	3/5/1999 9:16:00 PM
From: VIPER85730	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8960

John, That's why I asked the simple question, Why his renewed interest here? Everybody knows why I loved the stock 2 years ago, I was making GREAT money! Personally, I don't see any reason for short attack or anything else the way this stocks been acting lately. The only reason I can figure is that he knows one way or the other that the MCA approval is near. Why else would he be starting this again? Whatever, VIPER-------<

To: John A Satriano who wrote (8824)	3/7/1999 2:33:00 AM
From: Richard Miller	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8960

I never posted 50 messages in any day or even 3 days to give you some leeway. Perhaps you could prove me wrong when I call you a "deluded liar" by pointing out to this thread the precise dates. If not, they can take your fiction for what it is. Excuse me, you investors who lost millions, for telling you to ignore the hypsters of the era who were screaming you should buy at 15 and 18 dollars a share. I guess they'll never forgive me for telling it like it was and is. Johnny, If you are not a paid tout then and now, you sure act like one. If I had a financial interest in Q shares, perhaps I should win the most altruistic investor of the century award, for telling it like it was, rather than hyping it. Get rid of the skim, and any fool could get the stock back up to where it should be. However with the patents winding down, they are on a real Y2K spiral. Hey, Satriano, if anyone wants to buy into a company where the 2 top officers take 5% of every sales dollar (actually I believe more than the entire profit of the company) that is paid to Quigley, they should definitely do so. It takes a real "Loonie" to defend that company. It takes much more than a decent product to make a company's shareholder value increase. BTW, name any other public company that has a skim like Chuck and Guy's. Any!