Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (1221)	3/5/1999 4:49:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5821

Where are the papers!!! I offered to educate myself....where are all the papers supporting your "theory"!!! I asked for the titles of the five or six papers you quoted, please! "I have viewed the Vosiey Bay footwall core and it is clear that the basal rocks are a seabed sediment and juvenile at that. Clast of quartz where clearly visible. The rock below the sulphide contact was brown, totally unaltered and mildly banded like a varve clay. You could run a thumbnail along the fresh contact line of the sulphide layer that did not penetrate one millimetre into the footwall rock. This is obviously a sea bed vent deposit in character. To accept magmatic segregation in face of the obvious geological evidence is pathetic." you saw the core.......SO FREAKING WHAT... I DRILLED IT!!!!! I was willing to let things go but you blither on! The basal material is GNEISS, the dark grey / white bands are mineral segregation......one of the defining characteristic of ANY GNEISS!! It is the country rock into which the "troctolite" was intruded. Check any of the geology maps for the area. I find it amusing you are unable to distinguish primary sed features from metamorphism. If this geo-flailing is because I have stepped on your toes somewhere else let me know and I will make amends.....anything to stop this embarrassment. 1King

To: E. Charters who wrote (1221)	3/5/1999 5:22:00 PM
From: Tom Cat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

E. Charter, I have been reading your notes and comments for the past three years, and let me share an impression that I hope you take as a positive feedback instead of a criticism. It is my experience in life, that when someone does not have a clue of what is talking about, tends to overuse the technical jargon and technical words that have a meaning to just a few. In fact, I still do not understand a word of what you write, if you really knew what you are talking about, you should be able to explain to my 10 year old son the contents of your techno-rambling. I am always inclined to listen to the people that has the experience, I think 1King (whoever he is), Terry Creps, et al, are making valid points...but what exactly is the substance of the million words that you have written recently? TC