SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MeDroogies who wrote (1956)3/5/1999 3:34:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13062
 
1.In what circumstance? When? In the early stages of pregnancy? By law, no one can stop a woman in the first trimester. Maybe in the last stage, I can't say for sure...
2. So you are in favor of child abuse?As long as it is the a-holes choice?
3&4. Not so, but since I don't have the data at my finger tips, I can only note that your assertion defies common sense, and unless you can prove it, I decline to yield.
5. The logic is impeccable. Show the gap.
6. Not so. The reason that certain clinics have been targeted is precisely that. Even the pro- partial birth people argued that the number of purely elective abortions using that procedure was "small"... No, they shouldn't shoot the doctors.
7...in a moment...



To: MeDroogies who wrote (1956)3/5/1999 3:39:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13062
 
You do not think that the populace has been polarized by this? You yourself mention the roughly 50-50 split. And do you think that the Court is exempt from your general suspicion of government?