Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bob who wrote (29264)	3/5/1999 4:44:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 31646

Drop the fraud BS. I'm willing to listen to a reasonable opinion. AMEN!!!! I don't mind dissident opinions as long as they are logical and well crafted. Alternative views make us think and reflect upon whether we have taken into account all the issues. When we get locked into our preconceptions, we find ourselves backstabbed by them, or a deceitful management (as CPU shareholders suddenly discovered). It is easy to flaunt the hype or the slander... but much more difficult to back it up with careful analysis. The case has already been made by many individuals out here about why the longs think the company will continue to grow and warrant higher prices. Now I would like to hear specific arguments as to why TAVA will decline. (certainly something better than "well, I was right on ACLY, and it was a Y2K company".) TAVA is a Systems integration company with specific expertise in the heavily fragmented automated process layer (correct me if I'm wrong in this understanding, Rick Bullota), not just a one-product software tool vendor. And if that database of 80,000 embedded sytems/chips has value in non-y2k related work, all the better. After all, Y2K assessment generally requires mapping out the current process operations of clients facilities. I suspect that kind of raw data will prove valuable in proposing future modernization projects. I really want someone to tell why my analysis is so screwed up. Tell me what I've overlooked, good and bad. After all, isn't that what a discussion thread is all about in the first place, discussion?? Regards, Ron