SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: opalapril who wrote (8950)3/5/1999 5:06:00 PM
From: Edscharp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17367
 
The problem with all speculation is the same.

You might be right, but you might be wrong. Which is it?



To: opalapril who wrote (8950)3/5/1999 5:25:00 PM
From: aknahow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17367
 
Mr. Prill, if you want to discuss Monica or going down today, please do not continue to use this board. Post like this are not appropriate!

"Much meaning can be conveyed by a a frown, a grunt, a smile, or an almost imperceptible shake (or nod) of the head."

I believe it is a bit uncouth to include her answer about sending troops to Bosnia on this board!



To: opalapril who wrote (8950)3/5/1999 6:26:00 PM
From: Jinping Shi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17367
 
Hi, All

Just want to add that (I know,it is not a accurate argument)one
does not have to break the double-blinded rule to learn that the
treat group is not better if it indeed is no better.

If the overall effective rate is about
the same as the "believed" placebo "should-be" rate, then the secrete
is no longer a secrete.

Could that be a reason?

Jim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News