SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fedhead who wrote (6015)3/5/1999 5:18:00 PM
From: Sleeper  Respond to of 29970
 
Please read post #5915 for information on DSL speed vs. Cable speed

Sleeper



To: fedhead who wrote (6015)3/5/1999 5:29:00 PM
From: Jing Qian  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29970
 
DSL has fatal limitation that makes it a loser. DSL can handle 1Mbps without problem. But when the bandwidth increases in the future, DSL is not as scalable as cables. Don't worry about DSL. Do your research and the more you research the more certain you know DSL will not be a competition to cable. But DSL will have a minority market share.

Please note the future of Internet will be streaming data broadcasts that demand bandwidth of 1Mbps and beyond.



To: fedhead who wrote (6015)3/8/1999 11:35:00 AM
From: David Harker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
>What happens when AOL/ YHOO makes a deal with some othe cable
>modem service provider like Time Warner ?

Time Warner does not compete with ATHM. A given home
in the USA only has one cable line, and whoever owns the
other end of that line is who you can get cable internet
access from. If that is a partner of ATHM, or Time Warner, or
whoever, all depends on where your house is. If AOL makes a
deal w/ Time Warner, that only helps those people who live
in an area w/ Time Warner cable access.