Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Booking Holdings (formerly Priceline) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Scott who wrote (44)	3/6/1999 11:48:00 AM
From: Mary Remington	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2743

Interesting that you thought the article in Barrons was positive. I felt that it was somewhat negative. Made me think I might let this one pass. Anyone else read the article? Might be good to hear some more opinions.

To: Robert Scott who wrote (44)	3/6/1999 4:51:00 PM
From: John H. Farro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2743

There has been a lot of confusion over the ticker symbol that Priceline will use. PRLN now belongs to Paracelsian, so Priceline should be using PCLN, though different sources still say Priceline will come out under the PRLN symbol. Incidentally, I know of a few people who started doing research on PRLN, stumbled across Paracelsian, and decided to either buy Paracelsian instead of Priceline or else put Paracelsian on their watch list as a possible buy in the near future. If any of you are interested in finding out more about Paracelsian, and why some people may chose it over Priceline, check this out. Subject 26220 Robin Messing P.S. Let me apologize to anyone who is offended by this spam. I normally don't go on boards that are totally unrelated to Paracelsian, but there is now a great deal of confusion between the two companies so I didn't think it was totally inappropriate to post this link here.