Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microphonics Inc. (mrps) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe-MA who wrote (2462)	3/6/1999 12:35:00 PM
From: Joe-MA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8189

I have been trying to find info on"CTRL" which MRPS mentions in its pr yesterday as a competitor. The only company I could find was Chemi-trol Chemical Co. NASDQ- CTRL- a maker of steel pressure tanks (and also some chemical division). Nothing I could find in its SEC filings (haven't read them all) mentions anything sounding like a ultrasonics device at all. Is this the competitor referred to? Does anyone have any info re this company "CTRL"- I thought it would be interesting to see what the competition is up to.

To: Joe-MA who wrote (2462)	3/6/1999 3:17:00 PM
From: re: MAX	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8189

Joe-MA, I follow your stuff on RB. You are excellent. Welcome aboard the MRPS team at SI. re:MAX

To: Joe-MA who wrote (2462)	3/6/1999 4:09:00 PM
From: Jon Scott	Respond to of 8189

Just reading through the endless posts, so gotta respond in sequence. It generally takes a number of signatures to get a PR out. To get GM or Ford to OK a release with their name/trademark mention is a task in itself. I'm guessing it takes a good deal of time as well. Yesterday's PR was put together as comprehensively and quickly as could be expected. It was probably done to enlighten and to quell demand from all the new shareholders. And to deliver something as promised. That's why I'm expected another one before the financials which elaborates even further. Let me continue reading more posts now...

To: Joe-MA who wrote (2462)	3/6/1999 5:18:00 PM
From: learnstocks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8189

Joe-MA, Re your 2463, welcome to this thread. I agree that healthy scepticism is needed at this point. But civil discussion is most healthy to the collection of pertinent facts. Vic