Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tokyo Joe's Cafe / Societe Anonyme/No Pennies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (59938)	3/6/1999 8:19:00 PM
From: Instock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 119973

Three is not bad at all, but who is number one and two? Tmex has to rate the most fun to short, or at least it does with me. Tony, to be honest and fair. Tmex has picked some very good LONG Daytrades and Mo Mo plays. That is his better part. When he opens his mouth, it all goes down the drain though. He has no morals, not that mine are so great or anything, but he has crossed most everyone's line. He has ZERO class. Promoting and sales are one thing, Internet burglary is something else. Wish Tmex would leave the Dark side of the force, he could be a Great LONG stock picker. That is the last time I say anything good about Tmex... I, like SO MANY, have grown to dispise him. He is Evil. He has Loyalty to no one, not even those who pay him $100.00 a month for him to spread false information. NOT Mistaken information as anyone could do, but out right false information. Ahh... I am going out and have a drink. Talk sports or Politics for awhile.. Instock

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (59938)	3/6/1999 8:29:00 PM
From: TokyoMex	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 119973

Is this you Elgindy ? Subj: RE: Anthony Elgindy aka Anthony@Pacific Date: 1/20/99 6:24:30 PM Eastern Standard Time From: xxxx@erols.com ) To: TokyoJoe@mail.com - >>My point regarding Chatfield is that they have a dubious history >and were listed in the same article as Elgindy.. > >Elgindy IMO and others I know who wre suing him >is a pretty insidious figure. xxxxxx ,who started the PNLK >pump and the absurd valuations for the company at the time of your >article, is somehow affiliated with Elgindy. based on his interactions >with Elgindy (Anthony@Pacific) and where he posts on Silicon Investor. > >Once the stock is pumped, Elgindy gets an outfit like Chatfield to do a >report to puncture the irrationally exhuberant bubble that his underling >"xxxxxxxx" pumped. Since Elgindy trades on the Instanet, >he can trade on markets like Canadian ones to short otc-bb issue shares. > >So Elgindy profits on both the pump and the dump. Chatfield is complicit, >and you just report the story based on the belief that "the company" >is repsonsible due to its attempts to market through the Stock genie >Newsletter. > >I agree at the time of your writng that PNLK wasn't a $8 stock with whatever >market cap that implied. However, I disagree that PNLK is somehow a "stinky >company". The company had to change website developers and that delayed all their >marketing and membership sign ups and efforts. > >> >> >Now back to Elgindy, if you read through the info below and other info I >copied you on, you'll see that Elgindy was formerly a sleezy mm, who lost his >registration. > >Instead of prosecution, he became a SEC informer. However, instead of doing >his job diffidently, he first trades on the inside info he receives both from >Wall Street and the SEC before noting anyone's transgressions to the SEC. > >From what I've been told, he did a show on 20/20 that was delay though >others didn't >know it. he traded on the info that was later disclose on that show that >created market activity. >Plus he also is suppose to have a very sophisticated trading system that is >interconnected with 9 or so offices so he can effectively direct market >activity through collusion and arbitrage trading. > >The thing that is most sickening and makes me the most indignant is that he >professes to be on the side of "the small investor" because of his connections to the >SEC. > >Also because of Elgindy's connections to the SEC, he acts as if he has the >impunity to say and do whatever he wants to no matter how manipulative or libelous >it is. I certainly hope this isn't true, and almost on the verge of driving down to >DC to confront John Stark on this issue. > > >