To: Frost Byte who wrote (44318 ) 3/7/1999 10:22:00 AM From: Glenn D. Rudolph Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
Frost Byte, You clearly are not even close on any fact you stated and I am not just giving an opinion on that. You ought to be embarassed about your post when in fact you have not done proper research or do not understand what has been said in the 10Ks, 10Qs, management and the analysts. Let's start at the begeinning:1) AMZN's books business is profitable No! Even by managment's own admission the book business is not profitable. Managment does claim that the books business was profitable for December 1998 only and that is disputable but lets say that in the month where people tend to buy the most, books were profitable for those four weeks.2) AMZN, if they wanted to, could be profitable.....all they would need to do is reduce their SG&A expenses. Tead the 10Q. I posted a link here to a brakdown of the 10Q and even if Amazon had no SG&A expense, their operations would still be at a loss.3) AMZN is not just a retailer of books, cds, videos....they are attempting to be THE WALMART of the web...THE retailer on the web......They have just added drugs/consumer products and that is just the beginning. AMZN does not sell drug store products. They do have a minority stake in a online drugstore firm call Drugstore.com. Secondly, you better focus on what Amazon is now anot what they are attempting to be. I am in retail jewelry and I am attempting to gain a monopoply in that industry by putting all of my competition out of business. It is not likely<G> Also, what is a "WALMART of the web?" Walmart does fine in their brick and mortar stores but they do not sell the majority of merchandise bought by consumers by a long shot. They happen, at this point in time, to have the largest gross sales and profits of any retailer but compared to the entire retail market, they are 2%.4) A report came out on Bloomberg this weekend stating that e-commerce is expected to be $900 billion in 2003, up from $40 billion this year. This is true but $800 billion of that is business to business and $100 billion is retail. We do not know if the numbers will pan out but they still are not great for online retailers. 5) The management team at AMZN is brilliant, they are backed by John Doerr/Kleiner Perkins, and are working their butts off. The hard work and brilliance is subjective. Actually, I believe they are far from brilliant in that they have made some huge tactical errors over the last year. I do not see them at work daily so cannot comment on how hard they work. Working smart is more important anyway.6) Look for Amazon insurance, financial services, travel, greeting cards, and anything that could possibly be sold on the Internet....look for these announcements this year. This is not now,is immaterial and pure speculation. Also, the chances of any of theses turning a profit are small.9) AMZN is cash flow positive. Amazon is cash flow negative. Look it up!10) 1999 for AMZN is like 1995/1996 for AOL...when AOL said screw Wall Street, we are building this business for the long-term...remember how much negative press they got for sending everyone disks for free access? AMZN is running their business for long-term shareholder value...... AOL has subsribers. The business are entirely different.7) Merrill Lynch is about to initiate coverage on Amazon...Henry Blodget, the guy with the $400 Amazon price target, has just joined Merrill - keep in mind, Merrill has 13,000 brokers. Does this have any correlation to Amazons fundamentals? Does it mean anything? Please respond with answers to my statements and use documentation rather than hype. I have done my due diligence. You please do yours. Glenn