Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jimsy who wrote (7178)	3/7/1999 8:21:00 PM
From: Jimsy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

Frank - supplementary, any snippits on what Marum is up to?

To: Jimsy who wrote (7178)	3/8/1999 9:04:00 AM
From: Famularo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

>>>Most serious well-managed exploration companies build up a base or inventory of properties, and sooner or later they get some of them going into feasibility stages, and sometimes into an operating mine.<<< Jim, I couldn't have said it any better. Mentioned this myself on many occasions. If it was not for the 62% control of Ashton Australia, I would have contributed anything under my power to change the players on that team. We need results or a new team. Too much money has been spent, and IMO, mislead information has lead many investors the wrong way. Their releases were well written. They are the one's who should be blamed for the rise of the stock. If you reread their releases re K11 and K14, you can agree that they mislead readers re the potential of K14/K11. Obviously, they are legally protected with a disclaimer re addtional sampling is required to confirm. Very common in junior exploration companies but never expected Ashton to fall in this group. We'll see what happens from here! regards Frank