Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (37135)	3/7/1999 1:24:00 AM
From: JBL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I love it when you go ballistic Daniel ! It brings me great joy. Now that you seem to find Broaddrick credible, can you tell us why you were attacking people who bring up her story ? Are these people not entitled to hear Clinton's version of events ? Even your favorite, the NYT, believes that they are entitled to hear it... I'll help you with your options....: 1. . Tell us that Broaddrick is not credible, and that I'm putting words in your mouth...(I'm afraid you burnt your bridges on this one) 2 . Tell us that she is credible, which implies that people are entitled to hear Clinton's version (as stated by the NYT), and that you were out of line for assaulting people who bring up her story. 3. Throw another little fit, calling people "Pus pots", "Little liar" and other exotic names, to avoid the subject altogether.... 4. Speak in Clintonese (Danielese ?) , where the meaning of "is" is only known to you.... I'll be waiting to see the interesting cocktail you come up with.... May I suggest you don't answer at all, so that you stop making a fool of yourself...