Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SEVL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (304)	3/7/1999 8:42:00 AM
From: hoffy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 703

Anthony, you are a very busy person trying to convince everyone that this is a bad company. I guess when you short a stock and you convinced a lot of your followers to short it, you have to go around and try to bash it as much as possible. Is your best argument that it soared and crashed before so it will do it again. But that time they didn't sign a deal with the biggest internet player out there and have the prospect of a deal with a big computer manufacturer. Also you wrote, "SEVL is a turd and will be a huge loser and soon..they offer tutorials for software that can be learned on your own." Maybe you can learn it on your own but there are a ton of people who can't. Especially the older generation who want to become computer literate. I think tutorials will be a big money maker for someone because there will be a big demand for them. Will SEVL be a winner. I really don't know but now, you convinced me to hope so. I told you I don't own this but after reading all of the annoying bashing I really hope it soars and makes the longs a lot of money. After reading all of your posts on this board, TMEX's board and your own board I've concluded a few things: 1) You are worried that SEVL will go through the roof and you are short. 2) You hate to see other people, especially TMEX make money 3) You spend way too much time on S.I.

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (304)	3/7/1999 9:35:00 AM
From: Probart	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 703

To: Anthony@Pacific (59939 ) From: TokyoMex Saturday, Mar 6 1999 8:29PM ET Reply # of 59981 Is this you Elgindy ? Subj: RE: Anthony Elgindy aka Anthony@Pacific Date: 1/20/99 6:24:30 PM Eastern Standard Time From: xxxx@erols.com ) To: TokyoJoe@mail.com - >>My point regarding Chatfield is that they have a dubious history >and were listed in the same article as Elgindy.. > >Elgindy IMO and others I know who wre suing him >is a pretty insidious figure. xxxxxx ,who started the PNLK >pump and the absurd valuations for the company at the time of your >article, is somehow affiliated with Elgindy. based on his interactions >with Elgindy (Anthony@Pacific) and where he posts on Silicon Investor. > >Once the stock is pumped, Elgindy gets an outfit like Chatfield to do a >report to puncture the irrationally exhuberant bubble that his underling >"xxxxxxxx" pumped. Since Elgindy trades on the Instanet, >he can trade on markets like Canadian ones to short otc-bb issue shares. > >So Elgindy profits on both the pump and the dump. Chatfield is complicit, >and you just report the story based on the belief that "the company" >is repsonsible due to its attempts to market through the Stock genie >Newsletter. > >I agree at the time of your writng that PNLK wasn't a $8 stock with whatever >market cap that implied. However, I disagree that PNLK is somehow a "stinky >company". The company had to change website developers and that delayed all their >marketing and membership sign ups and efforts. > >> >> >Now back to Elgindy, if you read through the info below and other info I >copied you on, you'll see that Elgindy was formerly a sleezy mm, who lost his >registration. > >Instead of prosecution, he became a SEC informer. However, instead of doing >his job diffidently, he first trades on the inside info he receives both from >Wall Street and the SEC before noting anyone's transgressions to the SEC. > >From what I've been told, he did a show on 20/20 that was delay though >others didn't >know it. he traded on the info that was later disclose on that show that >created market activity. >Plus he also is suppose to have a very sophisticated trading system that is >interconnected with 9 or so offices so he can effectively direct market >activity through collusion and arbitrage trading. > >The thing that is most sickening and makes me the most indignant is that he >professes to be on the side of "the small investor" because of his connections to the >SEC. > >Also because of Elgindy's connections to the SEC, he acts as if he has the >impunity to say and do whatever he wants to no matter how manipulative or libelous >it is. I certainly hope this isn't true, and almost on the verge of driving down to >DC to confront John Stark on this issue. > > >

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (304)	3/7/1999 11:32:00 AM
From: TATRADER	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 703

anthony, i am a technical trader, and respect everyone's opinion... I will quickly present the case for longs and shorts..I do not look at fundamentals..... First longs: 1)MACD Histogram zero line crossover and Pring KST zero line crossover.. 2)Stock held above 5.00 level and closed strongly...Take a look at 5 minute chart when she hit 4 15/16, and volume levels.. 3)Stocks history is usually to spike and sell-off same day..This time it didn't do it.. 4)Stock moved above 21 day and 50 day..Potential for 50 day traders to move in as we have possible expansion pivot... 5)Directional indicators show +D1 at 55 and -D1 at 7 with ADX moving up 3 to 43...Analysis is a mature trend with ADX over 40... In this case we study both simple stochastic and RS..Yes, RS is overbought, but simple stochastic is not..Reading is at 51.012... Need both to confirm overbought condition...so potential for another spike is definitely there.. 6)Smoothed rate of change did a reversal on Friday...move from 100.459 to 110.841... Now to the short point of interest..The reason that the stock has problems with 5.00 level, is simply put, overhead...I did my volume studies, and I calculate about 30 million shares at this level...We did well on Friday with 20 million, but another 10 million is needed..If volume levels die, off, Anthony will win this battle..Or if new buying does not come in at a 10 million clip, we will not hold the 5.00 level tomorrow...The only hope the longs have is another killer announcement rumored to come shortly before market close...But I am not going to count on that... I am looking for the stock to gap to the 6.00 level, where we will see who will win this long-short battle...I have been humbled too many times by the market to make any bold statements one way or another... Regards, TATRADER...