SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DanZ who wrote (392)3/7/1999 2:15:00 PM
From: out_of_the_loop  Respond to of 5582
 
Dan:

The timeframe you mention for the NEJM article is reasonable. The Since the first post about that was Feb. 4 by Iceberg who spoke with Dr. Hensley (http://127.0.0.1:3456/SI/~wsapi/investor/reply-7657838 if you use Browsemaster, post #194 on this thread if you do not), the time period is quite reasonable.

I have had a couple of friends/colleagues who have published in that journal which, in my opinion, is the most highly regarded journal for physicians (NEJM,JAMA, Annals of Int Med in that order - also my opinion), as opposed to strict basic science articles(best general journals are Nature & Science). The press watches the NEJM like white on rice.



To: DanZ who wrote (392)3/8/1999 12:32:00 AM
From: Madeleine Harrison  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5582
 
I see what you mean with Quigley.

Publication of the Zicam study is almost too much to
hope for. But I am.

Imagine being able to quote the NEJM in tv and radio commercials.
Yowzer!