SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microphonics Inc. (mrps) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe-MA who wrote (2670)3/7/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: Fbk32  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 8189
 
Joe:

The two ultrasonic/s units are IDENTICAL. they both are the same size, have the same number of rods, have the same two boxes and headset. This in and of itself is a violation of Trade Mark law. Not to mention the identical names..adding an "s" at the end won't satisfy any Court or Judge, They will find that the trademark of one or the other has been violated.

I would like to know directly from the company just what's going on between these two competitors. If MRPS won't fight for the exclusiveness of their product, then how are they going to "corner" the market.

Brian Connolly



To: Joe-MA who wrote (2670)3/8/1999 8:48:00 AM
From: learnstocks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8189
 
Joe-MA,
in your 2671, you responded about the Signature sound methodology as being the patent that MRPS has. I haven't read posts this morning but it still may be a very valid question unless someone has clarified this already.
Vic


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News