Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : QGLY - Funny Name Great Product. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Miller who wrote (8831)	3/8/1999 9:01:00 AM
From: John A Satriano	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8960

"Dicky": Lol! A paid tout? How many people on this thread attend Quigley meetings. I'd venture to say one or two of hundreds. You are one of those two. Can't stay away from Guy and the group can you? They'd probably ban you if they knew you were short the stock in 1997. Deny you were! What the heck are you talking about "Richard"? It would be easier to argue with you if you picked a theory and stuck with it. No, I won't deny being short Q... I have been at times. That's MY point though, not yours. You are rambling again. I have been to every stockholder meeting of every stock I've ever purchased that I didn't have to travel for. That's not very many, but Q is one of them. You are trying to make a conspiracy out of a shareholder going to a shareholder meeting. Think very hard "Dicky", does this really seem like sane behavior to you? Why don't you use your geographic access to pursuade the company to run it like it wasn't a private company. Again, what the heck are you talking about? Do you think that living near a company gives you some sort of control over it's management? There are plenty of public companies there in Chicago, do you think that living there enables you to tell their management what to do? Again, think hard... does this really sound sane to you? Notice you never answered the questions re: the outrageous skim. Hey, you finally noticed! That's because I don't entirely disagree with you on the subject. I have never argued with you on your skim theory, but you've been too worked up to notice! Just so the people on this thread know, you are a real big hitter. Invest in penny cents stocks right. What's INNO going to do now? I do have some penny stocks... are you looking to invest in INNO? As you know I don't give people advice on wether to buy or sell, but I'd suggest doing some EXTREME DD on this one. I just sold mine into the latest round of hype and don't plan to buy back. If you are looking for a real scumbag company to bother, INNO makes Q look saintly. It's painfully obvious you have not put to rest the fact that you are indeed a liar. I simply don't have to. Most of the people that read these boards have a good grasp of reality, so you are not fooling anyone. As I said, as soon as you clear up the two lies you posted I'll think about it, but you can't. You won't even refer to them. As you said: "Trying to change the subject is too classic a tactic of liars." I guess you would know. We're still looking for specific responses to my last post or denials. Your pap will not be responded to by this writer in any detail until then. If you forgot the questions, and accusations, I'll be happy to post them again. We? Who is this we? You may be looking for denials, but everyone else is reading these messages and laughing at you. I don't believe for a second that you won't reply again. You have made me that offer in the past and then renegged, I assume you will do it again. I guess you don't remember the time, years ago, that I said something negative about Q and you told me I should "speak up more often!" LOL, I guess you meant I should speak up as long as I agree with you. Folks are enjoying these messages. Each one makes you look more ridiculous. Keep it coming! J.S.