To: Jack Templin who wrote (2068 ) 3/7/1999 7:46:00 PM From: mark calder Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7720
Read it too, actually wrote an analysis, Wow, where to start. This book traces the history of the U of W HIT lab and the life of Tom Furness. Basically Four startup companies are detailed. F5 Labs, Virtual I/O, Zombie Virtual Reality Entertainment and Microvision. Not one good thing was ever mentioned about Microvision. The book depicts Tom Furness as a great, benevolent, down home folksy kind of guy who wouldn't cheat or hurt a flea. Steve Willey comes away as the most hated person in this book. The point of view adopted by this author is by association that of Furness's. There is a lot of bad blood between Microvision and the HIT lab. This is unfortunate because the early investment by the founder of Microvision, Casey Harlingten, a Canadian bond broker, saved the lab from bankruptcy. In my own opinion the basis for all this infighting and bad blood is the basic setup of the lab itself. On one hand we have an academic research facility set up to offer grad students and research fellows a facility to conduct their thesis research, being funded by companies determined to protect their intellectual property and competitive advantage. The academic types naturally have to publish their findings while the companies hold back all involved with nondisclosure agreements. From what I have read the early formation Microvision was a loose and fast arraignment. Furness was promised one quarter of all the stock in the company in return for his assistance at fund raising meetings. Fortunately for us this early agreement was a Handshake agreement between Furness and Ron Erickson. This and further stock and option agreements reached with Furness appear to be the basis of the lawsuit filed by Furness. Throughout the book Microvision and the senior management are made to look like bumbling fools who would steal a babies lollipop if they could get away with it. There are constant complaints about Steve Willey's desire for secrecy. The Author complains about his lack of access to Rutkowski and Willey constantly. Thank God for that too, given the hatchet job he did on them . There are a lot of telling "quotes" attributed to Steve Willey that may give a little insight to our current lack of information and news releases. In a nutshell Willey believes in keeping his cards close to his vest, and keeping his mouth shut until he has something to say. its ironic that Steve Willey is the only player in this book who has succeeded in taking a company public and making a success of it, while the rest of the players have always resorted to begging government agencies, companies and Venture capitalists for money. All of the companies mentioned except Microvision filed for bankruptcy or were bought out at fire sale prices by their creditors. The final postmortem section of the book says that Microvision will have failed by the time this book was published. In fact there were all sorts of technical predictions throughout the book that not only do not come true, but have been proved resoundingly wrong, such as the final size of a VRD scanner. Rutkowski is called stupid many times by an early HIT lab/Microvision engineer, David Melville, for even thinking about shrinking the VRD small enough to fit in a Cell Phone. Melville is the original inventor of the basic VRD scanner and quit out of fear after reading the first years annual report with all of its standard disclaimers. Finally I think I now know the source of some of these vile comments and posters on Yahoo who are so bent on killing this company. The book mentions two engineers from the HIT lab who were not offered positions at Microvision or any stock options for their early work. It was mentioned that they constantly are following the stocks performance and messages posted about it on the Internet. All in all I learned a little more about the technology and maybe a little more insight into Rutkowski and Willey, but I have to agree with these reviews of the book from Amazon.Com: A reader from Seattle , March 3, 1999 Soap Opera's are more realistic!! It would be great drama if it weren't for the fact that it's melodrama. Who could possibly believe such two dimensional characters rendered in vivid black and white? It's not even credible on the face of it let alone in the fact. In Moody's rush to lionize Furness and the HITL engineers and to enhance drama he leaves anything approaching objectivity completely aside. The immaturity of Furness and his mignons shows through in their "sour grapes" whining commentary which is full of expletives and extremes. Just another "visionary/engineer as victim" hack job, complete with poor fact finding and even a few completely fabricated events thrown in for good measure. A conspicuous lack of commentary from any of the business people who are so consistently slandered. Could have been an interesting story but... o_w_k@hotmail.com from Seattle , February 24, 1999 Facts inaccurate, credibility questioned. Was there in the early years of HITL. Worked with those involved both named and unnamed in this book. Key people and details conspicuously omitted. Credit misplaced. Some slandered in effort to make dramatic stories. Sources and/or accounts obviously not verified before publishing. Some facts are skewed. Read it for what it is: Part entertaining fiction, part meaningless gossip. Well there's my opinion Mark