SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VD's Model Portfolio & Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Biomaven who wrote (6528)3/7/1999 10:59:00 PM
From: Rocketman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9719
 
I really haven't looked at Genelogic at all. But, there name keeps coming up in conversations, so I might have to dig some time soon.

Rman



To: Biomaven who wrote (6528)3/8/1999 6:06:00 AM
From: lwd  Respond to of 9719
 
Peter: When I got your message, I had just read the following interview with Elizabeth Silverman in Individual Investor. She likes Gene Logic. iionline.com
GLGC looks interesting to me.
------------------------------------------------------------

Up from the Roach Motel
Elizabeth Silverman cherishes unloved stocks that deliver happy returns.
by Andrew Feinberg

Biotechnology is a notoriously volatile market sector that perhaps wiped out as many investors as it has enriched. Its companies are flush with the potential for creating highly profitable biologically derived drugs and products, but the vast majority have no revenue, no earnings, and a small float of shares. Elizabeth Silverman, an independent analyst formerly with BancBoston Robertson Stephens, has a low-risk way to play the sector: buy "roach motel" stocks.

Silverman analyzed the performance of biotech IPOs over the past five years and found one group that delivered terrific rewards. She calls them roach motel stocks because institutional investors shun them, thinking that once they underperform and check into the roach motel, as the infamous TV ad warned, they'll never check out. But Silverman found 11 stocks that checked out and moved up, returning an average of 293% from their IPOs through the end of 1998. From best performer down, the roaches were: Incyte Pharmaceuticals, Neurex, Zonagen, SangStat Medical, Inhale Therapeutic Systems, Aviron, Vical, Human Genome Sciences, Coulter Pharmaceuticals, Genset, and Pharmacyclics.

How did you develop the roach motel concept?

Over the past few years, most biotech IPOs have exhibited the same clear, depressing pattern. A stock would go public, rise a bit, and then quickly fall as investors flipped shares. A lot of biotech offerings simply died on the vine, and there was a great deal of pessimism about the sector.

Because most biotechs have small market caps, are thinly traded, and don't have analyst coverage, institutional investors won't buy in for fear they won't be able to get out without dramatically affecting share prices. I wanted to look back to see if any biotechs that were shunned later recovered and enjoyed substantial gains, and I found the roach motel stocks.

What does it mean when a stock is languishing in a roach motel?

Roach motel stocks are those that are ignored by most investors. These stocks have an average daily trading volume of less than 40,000 shares for at least one quarter without much, if any, share-price appreciation. The 40,000-shares-a-day cutoff is admittedly arbitrary, but it shows the stocks are very illiquid. Even though there may be good values among these companies, investors aren't buying in. And because large-caps recently have outperformed small-caps in almost all sectors of the market, including biotech, you're likely to find even more biotech stocks than usual that are undervalued.

So what causes stocks to check out of roach motels?

Before I studied the sector, I assumed company-specific events would be the trigger, but that isn't true. Roach motel stocks usually begin moving up when the entire biotech sector starts performing well. That suggests you should buy these stocks as the sector begins improving, rather than look for good news about a particular company.

So investors shouldn't buy biotechs when sentiment about the sector is negative?

If you do, you'll find the fundamentals of particular companies don't affect performance that much. Biotech is a unique sector in that it's binary: Sometimes stocks are hot; sometimes they endure periodic Ice Ages. When the sector is off, it's very difficult for almost any company's shares to move. But when things are going well, it's one of the few sectors where stocks can double or triple quickly.

How does an investor select the right roach motel stocks?

Concentrate on companies covered by at least two or three analysts, because institutions are more likely to invest in those. Read research reports and look closely at companies' balance sheets. Ideally, you want to find companies that are trading at or near the value of their cash on hand, and can cover their burn rate [the amount of cash they run through] for at least two years. Since good management is important, I look for managers who have worked many years in the industry.

If investors buy a roach motel stock, how long should they expect to wait for a reward?

Investors need patience. The 11 big winners I studied stayed in their roach motels for an average of seven quarters. That can be frustrating, especially when money is pouring into already profitable biotech companies and information technology companies while these stocks aren't moving.

Some companies that check into the roach motel will never check out. What are the signs of a perennial loser?

If a company doesn't deliver on its promises--if a drug isn't entering clinical trials on time, or management doesn't sign contracts as expected--watch out. It is also a potential problem if revenues aren't ramping up and annual losses aren't decreasing.

What roach motel stocks do you like now?

My favorites are Gene Logic (Nasdaq: GLGC) and CombiChem (Nasdaq: CCHM). Both have very good management teams and strong balance sheets.

Gene Logic uses a proprietary system to discover genes that might be used to develop drugs, or that drugs can act upon. It has research contracts with Procter & Gamble, American Home Products, and SmithKline Beecham. Its burn rate is $10 million to $15 million a year, it has $35 million in cash, and it's signing up three or four customers a year. The stock ran up to $10.13 last July, but recently was trading at $7.38.

CombiChem is a drug discovery company that uses computer software to identify new drug possibilities extremely quickly--it has cut the drug discovery cycle in half, which potentially saves a fortune for pharmaceutical manufacturers. The stock traded as high as $8.44 last year and recently could be had at $4. But fundamentally, nothing has changed. The company has a very good business model, and fees from customers cover all its research costs. I expect CombiChem to break even in 1999 and actually earn money in 2000, assuming it continues to attract three to five new customers per year. Gene Logic went public in November 1997 and CombiChem in May 1998, so there may be some more waiting to do.

Is there an area of biotech you think is especially promising now?

I particularly like genomic stocks, the subsector of biotechs that focuses on genetic research and mapping. For the first time, we are able to look at and analyze the blueprint of life. That means we are able to design drugs for new molecular targets. Eventually a lot of preventive medicines will come to market. What's more, this type of company tends to have a relatively low burn rate, partly because a portion of its research costs are likely to be funded by corporate partners.

Can value investors apply your theory to other sectors of the market?

I'm sure they could, but I haven't researched the issue. Clearly, if you can find stocks that are unloved for no good fundamental reason, you have a chance of achieving a very high return.

Is this a good time to invest in roach motel stocks?

It's not a bad time--and it may soon be a very good time. Right now biotech is somewhat ignored because investors are fixated on technology stocks, Internet stocks in particular. Some biotech stocks have been doing very well--the American Stock Exchange biotech index is up 75% since the summer--and in general there has been good news in the sector. Amgen won its arbitration against Johnson & Johnson for rights to the red-blood-cell stimulant NESP, while SangStat Medical reported a successful trial of its cyclosporine drug for transplant patients, as did GelTex Pharmaceuticals for Cholestagel, a drug to reduce cholesterol. Another big piece of good news could set off a real rally in the sector.




To: Biomaven who wrote (6528)3/8/1999 7:02:00 AM
From: lwd  Respond to of 9719
 
Friday March 5, 4:02 pm Eastern Time
Company Press Release
SOURCE: Gene Logic Inc.
Gene Logic to Release Fourth-Quarter Results Monday, Responds to Investors' Questions
GAITHERSBURG, Md., March 5 /PRNewswire/ -- Gene Logic Inc. (Nasdaq: GLGC - news) will release its fourth-quarter and year-end results before the market opens on Monday, March 8. The company also responded today to some investors' questions about an article in yesterday's Wall Street Journal.

The Journal article described plans by some pharmaceutical companies to form a consortium to develop a public database of single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs. Several investors have called Gene Logic with concerns about the impact this announcement might have on the company. Gene Logic does not have a program for discovery of SNPs and has no plans to develop a SNP database. The company focuses on building gene expression databases, which are different from SNP databases in both their content and their application to the drug discovery process. Thus, if a public SNP database consortium is formed, it will have no adverse impact on the company.

In fact, Gene Logic would stand to benefit from a new public SNP database, since Gene Logic integrates its own and its customers' databases with public databases and sells software that facilitates such integration. The more public data available, the greater the value of Gene Logic's products and services.

Michael J. Brennan, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer, will hold his regular quarterly conference call on Monday, March 8, from 8:55 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. EST. U.S. and Canadian participants may call 800-633-8755, and international participants may call 212-346-0190. The replay of Gene Logic's conference call may be accessed by dialing 800-633-8284 (U.S. and Canada) or 619-812-6460 (international) from 12 noon on Monday, March 8th until 12 noon on Wednesday, March 10th. Enter the reservation number 11921358.

This press release contains forward-looking information, including statements about the value of SNP databases to Gene Logic. Actual results may differ materially from these projections because of a number of risk factors, including uncertainties associated with competition, technological advances, the company's ability to enforce its intellectual property rights, and the impact of the intellectual property rights of others. These risk factors and others are more fully described in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, the Form S-4 filed in connection with the acquisition of Oncormed Inc., and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

SOURCE: Gene Logic Inc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: Biomaven who wrote (6528)3/8/1999 11:42:00 AM
From: RCMac  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9719
 
Peter,

In addition to the GLGC thread, there has been some discussion of GLGC on the "NIFTY NINE …." thread: techstocks.com etc.

That thread has also spun off a Gene Therapy thread, which has some potentially useful discussion and links:
Subject 25613

I haven't paid much attention to GLGC or the discussions on these threads (I'm far from up to speed on even the basics), but a couple of the participants (TexasDude, Mike McFarland, David A. Kincade and some others) are thoughtful and enterprising (if nonscientist) investors.

Your post (" . . . basically an INCY type company . . . " - music to my ears, if GLCC's science and execution measure up to this ambition), together with the link to the Washington Post article, tell me that I should pay attention and get up to speed. Thanks.

--Bob



To: Biomaven who wrote (6528)3/8/1999 11:20:00 PM
From: poodle  Respond to of 9719
 
Peter,
I followed GLGC about year ago. If I have 10 minutes I will send you some details.
Briefly, yes, it's "data seller" for money upfront and royalties.
CEO is excellent. Intelligent, extremely active, well educated and seems to be able to deal very well with everyone, including pharmas. Analysts love him a lot.

Chips seems to be a very good idea, AFFX can't claim too much here, at least that's Brennan's point. Again, that should be the subject for separate technology discussion and patent checking.

If my memory is correct, they have two major directions, and so "divisions". Software and molecular biology/biotechnology. Software should be developed for analysis of their own data from "experimental division" and to integrate all available outside databases. Experimental "division" seems to deal with differences in gene expression in different tissues (for example, comparison between heart and brain) and the same tissues from normal donors vs patients with specific disease. The idea is to find specific gene activated or inactivated in particular organ in patients with specific disease. These genes can be potential targets for treatment (or innocent markers of the disease, which may be useful for diagnostics).
I have never done serious research(well, I could and should), but Logic seems to be very reasonable at the first glance.
However...
It's good when analysts like you, but, still, it's better to avoid conflicts with SEC. I do not see it as a huge problem, but someone definitely does.
Second, (it's not for you, Peter), it's seems to be a good idea to check info from mass media. For example, investors were excited some day because some article mentioned huge insiders buying for last 2 years or so. If they did not check prices of such purchases they could be little confused.
Also, PR is trying to explain investors concerns by WSJ article. It may or may not be the main reason.
May be good time to buy now, but I will wait. Prefer to lose opportunity rather than money.

In general, investors excitement about genomic and similar companies is hard to understand.

Good night.



To: Biomaven who wrote (6528)3/11/1999 8:33:00 PM
From: BRAVEHEART  Respond to of 9719
 
Hi PETER,

I have followed GLGC since it's IPO...targeted it at three. I am not one to fully understand it's science. I can appreciate it's potential implications and the unique niche it has carved. I agree the dilution will create wild price swings. Cheap shares will do this. So do acquisitions as well as the freeing up of lock up periods. Personally I am targeting GLGC at ~4. I would be surprised to see it drop below that level in the current market. If it were to the downside looks like strong support at $3. The upside is eight to ten. Trade out and back in if the trend warrants.

Have you checked the Yahoo site. Actually rather respectable. Besides Steven Push will answer just about any question you might have and he will put it within the context of the industry. Heck go over & pick his brain.

BEST WISHES
JEFFREY