Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FMK who wrote (9024)	3/8/1999 1:10:00 AM
From: MGV	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

You might want to repeat to everybody long and worried: 1. when "it will be a $100 stock!!! 2. when the first purchase order will be signed 3. how dominating VLNC will be and how wrong everyone (and that is everyone but the emotionally distressed on this thread) is in thinking that the conclusions you state are preposterous You also probably should add a few more unannounced, unreported but material phantom transactions involving VLNC's yet unsold product. When John Curtis starts questioning you, you need to step up your hype. You might want to try making it a little more credible if you want it to be effective. Curtis at least may be figuring you out.

To: FMK who wrote (9024)	3/9/1999 8:47:00 AM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Fred: I made no direct statement regarding that Army contract. My statement was directed at those Mars probe mis-statements. Nothing more. I suggest you reference the Nasa press-kits available at sites I've previously quoted. If'n yer speaking about my general comment about folks checking their facts, well forgive me if I accidentally painted the Army with the same "rumors" brush, heh! Overall, however, d.d. is a MUST, particularly when speculating, and most particularly when folks start throwing stuff like "Mars probes" around, eh? And when it's easily determined that this piece of information is wrong.....weell....it casts doubt on ALL other pieces of information less easily corroborable, no? So if'n folks play it straight we'll all be better off. Just my opinion of course. As fer me holdings, as a long in VLNC. Weeelll, let's just say I'm right where I want to be. ;-) Bottom line? Speculating....ahhhhh....Don'tcha just luuuv it? HEH! Regards! John~

To: FMK who wrote (9024)	3/11/1999 7:49:00 PM
From: Robert Einstein	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Mr Kallit, You have been trying to talk up this stock for over a year.I was infatuated by your depth of knowledge (??) and your convincing style. I have asked you some questions in 2 posts and you have not responded. Now I am convinced that you are a desperate GAMBLER,and are leading a lot of people to RUIN including yourself,if you haven't done so already. You keep talking of "Big money managers and people in the know", that you know. I am sorry but it sounds mainly like wishful thinking and figmets of your imagination You should be ashamed of yourself. :-( Robert