Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3DFX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey P who wrote (11012)	3/8/1999 3:20:00 AM
From: Patrick Grinsell	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 16960

P.S. one stupid thought... don't you think if 3dfx would have shipped an underclocked product, Rivazone would have posted something about it? And ruin their shot at 15K per month? Jeff, assume you are right and that the board was supposed to be 166 mhz. This means 3dfx was lying instead of sending a bad board. Which is worse? I compared the Turok2 scores and it would seem that Sharky did indeed get an underclocked board or his number would be much higher after increasing the clock. I guess because I own the stock I am their worst critic. When management has done enough to earn a "pass" in my book I won't concern myself with such things. Pat P.S. Sharky's testing may be wrong so I doubt we've heard the end of the story if 3dfx is indeed in the right. There's a difference between memory speed and internal clock speed.