SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (29533)3/8/1999 3:22:00 AM
From: ForYourEyesOnly  Respond to of 116762
 
Written Testimony Submitted for the Record of

Lawrence Parks
Executive Director

The Foundation for the Advancement of Monetary Education
And a member of the Worker's Education Local 189, CWA
AFL-CIO

Before the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Securities, and GSE's House Committee on Banking and Financial Services United States House of Representatives

Hearing on Hedge Funds

March 3, 1999

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, I am Lawrence
Parks, Executive Director of the Foundation for the
Advancement of Monetary Education and a member of the
Worker's Education Local 189, CWA AFL-CIO. I am honored to have the opportunity to offer written testimony to this Committee.

For several years John Meriwether's Long-Term Capital hedge fund garnered many hundreds of millions, perhaps more than a billion, dollars annually in "profits" from currency and derivative trading. Consider the 3,000 other hedge funds along with major banks and brokerage firms doing the same thing. All told, back of the envelope, I reckon that these folks are pulling about $50 billion out of the markets each year. Citibank alone, according to its 1997 annual report, garnered $2 billion from this activity.

Since currency and derivative trading are zero-sum games, every dollar "won" requires that a dollar was "lost." But who are the losers that not only sustain but continue to tolerate these enormous losses year after year? Who could be so wealthy or so ignorant that $50 billion each year doesn't matter? Haven't they realized what a losing proposition this has been? What's more, why do they keep playing at a losing
game?

The answer is that the losers are all of us. And, while
neither rich nor stupid, we've been given no choice but to continue to lose. Every time we, on behalf of our businesses or ourselves, change one currency into another, we lose transaction costs. Every time we hedge a payment from or to foreign land, the cost of that hedge represents a loss of wealth. And every time one of these fiat currencies cannot be "defended," the workers, seniors and business owners of that country--folks like us--suffer big time.

Indeed, as their currencies are devalued, workers' savings
and future payments, such as their pensions, denominated in
those currencies lose purchasing power. Interest rates
increase. Commercial relationships predicated upon lower
interest rates unravel, and businesses go out of business.
Through no fault of their own, working people lose their
jobs in addition to their savings. There have been press
reports that, after a lifetime of working and saving, people
in Indonesia are eating bark off the trees and boiling grass
soup.

While not a secret, it is astonishing to learn how sanguine
the beneficiaries have become of their advantage over the
rest of us. For example, famed financier George Soros in his
recent The Crisis of Global Capitalism plainly divulges:
"The Bank of England was on the other side of my
transactions and I was taking money out of the pockets of
British taxpayers."

To me, the results of this wealth transfer are inescapable.
At the end of the day, a Malaysian worker has lost his life
savings so that a Wall Street bond trader can buy a $1,000
bottle of wine in an expensive restaurant in East Hampton.
And what benefit to society could possibly justify Long-Term
Capital's, other hedge funds' and particularly banks' and
brokerage firms', ability to reap so much money from this
activity? Does this "trading" result in any good or service
that improves anyone's life?

All the more outrageous is that ordinary taxpayers
subsidize this gambling through the "lender-of-last-resort"
bailout facility at the Federal Reserve or through the
International Monetary Fund. Whenever their reckless
over-leveraging goes against these firms, the rest of us are
called upon to bail them out! Even more incredible is the
size of the bailouts. In the last twenty years, bailouts
around the world have consumed almost $600 billion of
taxpayer money, with about a trillion dollars yet to come in
Japan alone. This represents wealth transfer from ordinary
people to financial firms, plain and simple.

I would like to think that the principals of Long-Term
Capital, George Soros, and the principals of other hedge
funds and the proprietary trading departments of banks and
brokerage houses are not evil. I prefer to think that it is
the fiat monetary system that is evil and corrupt. However,
it is extremely unlikely that those who are on the receiving
end of so much unearned wealth will cooperate in changing
the system.

More imperative than the injustice of the wealth transfer
is the fact that this malevolent system has brought us all
to the precipice of a complete monetary collapse. The
warnings are coming in ever-increasing frequency from those
who ought to know, including Treasury Secretary Rubin,
Federal Reserve Chairman Greenspan and President Clinton. In
foreign lands, fiat monetary systems--which are very much
like our own--have wiped out tens of millions of jobs along
with the savings and pensions of two generations. The danger
is that our jobs, savings and pensions may be wiped out as
well. It's time to reexamine the evidence supporting fiat
money and to reevaluate the resumption of a fair and honest
monetary regime and a system of honest monetary weights and
measures: the gold standard.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (29533)3/8/1999 3:29:00 AM
From: ForYourEyesOnly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116762
 
Re: FRB Ownership

"Can you show me where there are doubts about who "owns" the Fed?"

OK, since you already have that information, pls share with the rest of us who are still in the dark.

1. How many shares outstanding are there in the FBR?
2. Who are all of the shareholders?
3. How many shares does each of the shareholders own?
4. How much in profits has been paid for each share over the last 50 years?
5. How much did these shareholders pay for their shares?

If you cannot answer at least three of the above questions, then I would assert that there are still doubts about the ownership. If you can answer at least 3, then I thank you for sharing the info.

"personal bias is supposed to be subjugated to an objective search for the truth."

I am sorry but I am still imperfect......however, I would be interested in meeting this great person you speak of who is capable of eliminating personal bias.

Thank you.

THC