SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : eBay - Superb Internet Business Model -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SouthFloridaGuy who wrote (2057)3/8/1999 6:27:00 PM
From: Kimberly Lee  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 7772
 
ONSL's business model = selling $1 US Dollar bills for 75 cents each. The more they sell, the more they lose -- Syquest a la mode.

Since ONSL's EPS is sub zero, and EBAY at least have earnings.

Any positive earnings/ zero = infinity
$35 a share for a business that may not be around for another 2 years is definitely more expensive than paying $171 a share for a company that dominate the entire E-auctioneer sub-sector.

In two years, EBAY can easily retreat back to $50 a share while ONSL likely will follow Syquest's path. $171 - $50 = $121, represents a sizable retracement, but $35 - $0.5 (the rate it's going, ONSL will be trading on the bb, at probably $0.5 a share) = 34.50, a much, much larger % loss.




To: SouthFloridaGuy who wrote (2057)3/8/1999 6:45:00 PM
From: Brasco One  Respond to of 7772
 
Hey puff,

first lets start with your name: puff daddy? he is the biggest wanna be singer I have seen. H ere ixes Rock, rap, classic, jazz, anything he can steal. Anyway, ONSL sucks, because thay only make money by advertising on their site. They should be worth about 10 million dollars for a web site for advertisers. and e-bay, will be worth 5 bills in few years after the massive inside selling.

good luck, Donny