Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Solv Ex (SOLVD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Annie who wrote (6316)	3/8/1999 6:59:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6735

Annie, just tell me how to prove a negative. 4 biased folks who have a resentment aginst me because I was right and they were wrong claim to have a memory I don't share. If it's important to you, then it's up to you to prove it happened. In a civilized society, the burden of proof is on those who made the accusation. Do you also recall me telling you that SOLV was an overpriced pile of manure when it was in the 7s? See you at .02, Barb

To: Annie who wrote (6316)	3/8/1999 7:24:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 6735

Ok, here's a post from 4/24/98 where I made my promise to stick around. I said: "I will continue to post here from time to time until SOLV reaches my price target of $0.02 or less. Get used to it." #reply-4192723 See you at .02, Barb

To: Annie who wrote (6316)	3/8/1999 8:41:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 6735

Annie, perhaps you are recalling this post from 3/8/98 where I said "Perhaps I should leave this thread alone to wallow in it's ignorance, but I couldn't resist coming back now that I'm following another Canadien stock with a fanatic following." #reply-3641648 How about this one from 3/15/98? I said "Understand that I had no inclination to come to this thread this morning, and would not had you not called me here. Feel free to post to me if you like, but don't ask me to not come to the thread after you call me here.". #reply-3714974 On 12/13/97 I stated that I was here to stay: "I never mentioned anything about going to another thread. I will be here until this thing resides where it belongs at less than $0.02." #reply-2955294 See you at .02, Barb

To: Annie who wrote (6316)	3/8/1999 8:41:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 6735

Perhaps this one from 8/25/97 when I said "Just stopped by to check out the place, guess I'll turn out the lights on my way out." #reply-2040810 That was a joke, not a promise to leave forever. Here's one from 8/9/97, when asked to 'go away', I responded: "Don't hold your breath." #reply-1936807 In this post from 7/8/97, I respond to David Coakley's bet that he wouldn't be seeing me again by saying: "If that's me ("Barb" in quotes)your talking about, your wrong again Coakley." #reply-1723260 See you at .02, Barb

To: Annie who wrote (6316)	3/8/1999 8:44:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 6735

Well, I had quite a walk down memory lane this evening. I ran across the names of longs who are long forgotten on this thread. I read David Coakley swearing that there would be a massive short squeeze all the way down. Longs swearing that the SEC would slap Asensio in irons, and the company would sue him for all his money. There were fantasies that the company would be a success. There were many well presented arguments by the short seller pointing to the plain signs that SOLV was, is, and will always be worthless. I was surprised to see how confident I was in my position back then, seeing that it was my first short position. Of course, with a company like SOLV, it's foolish to think it will appreciate. I went all the way back to my first post: #reply-1502381 I did not find what you four folks claim to recall. I reviewed each post I made on this thread. I found and documented 6 instances where I said I wasn't going anywhere. I can now confidently say with 100% certainty that your memories are faulty, that there is absolutely no truth to the flapdoodle claim that I promised to, or even hinted in the least that I would leave this thread. It does not matter that you have joined together in your claim, it is untrue. If you or the other three repeat it you will be bald faced liars. I enjoyed my walk, and now I'll reiterate my promise: See you at .02, Barb