SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Riley G who wrote (53966)3/8/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: s martin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Are you angry now because you were double crossed and didn't get paid for organizing the cartel or are you angry because you're in trouble with the SEC?

To: +s martin (53953 )
From: +s martin
Monday, Mar 8 1999 3:50PM ET
Reply # of 53966

Addtiton: For those who can add 2 + 2, we see that Riley was having conversations
with Zapara from the beginning of the squeeze until the halt. Was Riley paid or is Riley
now angry that they failed to pay him ? You decide.
It appears to me that letting Riley spearhead your campaign for retribution is like having
the fox in the henhouse.

To: +tonto (53904 )
From: +Riley G
Saturday, Mar 6 1999 7:16PM ET
Reply # of 53954

Tonto,

I never implied that you were responsible for the documents procurement from there
original files. I strongly suspect that they were the proceeds from the Alexis International
burglary that was mentioned to me by Mork and Zappara in my conversations with
them in Sept-Dec. 1997,

Smoking Gun 000010000

To: +s martin (13211 )
From: +ptm, inc
Wednesday, Nov 5 1997 2:17AM ET
Reply # of 53952

as told to me, zapara was hired by promise and subseqent delivery of approx. 500,000
shares of the (sic) slightly misdirected shares destined for employee compensation
plan (i
guess all the kathie lee sweatshop workers in dominican, haiti, cuba wherever) by
roland
and gary if his companny, alexis international would "create" a vehicle via
internet/marketmakers/RILEY G/investors that would pump the stock of a
company that
posted the largest loss ever, no viable business (ie: revenues, riley blah blah blah),
and
go
figure. Everywhere i have checked with legitimate sources, (from p. lanzillo, ten
sleep,
ft.
lauderdale, hialeah, et.al) won't touch these guys with an out of state ten
foot(sheep)
pole.
so why the stock rise??? shillls like someschizos(I AM SCHIZOPHRENIC AND SO
AM I, last name G.) HELLO???

To: +s martin (53889 )
From: +Riley G
Saturday, Mar 6 1999 4:03PM ET
Reply # of 53954

I talked with Alexis as they were the IR firm. Sure I talked with him back in Aug.
1997,
as it was part of the DD. You mean you have not talked with them, how did you
do
your
DD without talking with him or Alexis?





To: Riley G who wrote (53966)3/8/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: TopCat  Respond to of 55532
 
>>>Try placing the blame on those responsible for the false press releases and SEC filings rather than a shareholder or shareholders for only speaking what they believed to be true and correct information based on all PUBLIC INFORMATION.<<<

Riley, I long ago placed "blame on those responsible for the false press releases and SEC filings"....Now, I am placing blame on you for denying everything I (and others) posted about that and trying (successfully, in many cases) to fool others into thinking that you knew what the truth was. A lot of people were hurt because of your hype and I don't like that. Fortunately, many people also avoided this scam because of my (and other's posts).

>>>Answer: Neither, as your question and answers are flawed.<<<

So, how are they flawed? Should the question have been (A) or (B) or (both)? Is the answer BOTH?....I suspect so.

>>>Answer: Wrong again. You speculate way to [sic] much.<<<

Care to be specific about what I speculated on that was way too much?

This idea that you now hold everyone responsible for their own investment is too much for me.....since you hyped the stock and told everybody over and over again to buy, buy, buy...

>>>Ps. This conversation is over, as you are adding nothing to the thread with your repeated bashings.<<<

And now, why am I not surprised at this reaction?? Skitter away, Riley! This isn't bashing....this is doing just you say you are trying to do.....find the truth!

TC