Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microphonics Inc. (mrps) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Scott who wrote (2899)	3/9/1999 8:40:00 AM
From: Joe-MA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8189

I agree Jon, but I also think MRPS should get the chance to make a more formal reply to the email from Mr. Roche from CTRL. This email apparently went to a number of people and without a formal response, can give new investors a very confusing picture on MRPS.

To: Jon Scott who wrote (2899)	3/9/1999 9:21:00 AM
From: lac	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8189

Jon is right The issue is the technology not the name What is the worst that can happen? - the name gets changed! Micromanaging this Company via the internet is ok to a degree but only once per issue that arises. A lot of time gets wasted by the Company when many investors all ask the same question. Whoever had the idea of one spokesperson from the thread was on target, but before the Company gets asked the question, we as investors should discuss what are the important questions to ask. If any one investor still wants a certain question asked after that then they do have the absolute right to call the Company. I think you will find that with the quality of this thread most questions will be resolved before they ever get to the Company Jeff

To: Jon Scott who wrote (2899)	3/9/1999 10:00:00 AM
From: learnstocks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8189

Jon, Re your 2899, while I agree conceptually with the fact that all companies involved with technology have legal and patent squabbles, I don't think that being on the backburner is reason not to investigate. I think that CTRL, Inc., in particular, looks at potential dollar signs in its corporate eyes. Let's say, for example, that Mr. Roche hasn't done much of anything over the years to develop the product. But, all of a sudden, there is a major increase in interest in MRPS stock based upon the ULTRAPHONICS trademark of a product that CTRL Systems, Inc. may (or may not) have been involved. Well, if Mr. Roche could file a lawsuit (and win) then his company could just have a chance to gain money with no effort at all outside of filing and pursuing a successful lawsuit. Am I wrong? Vic