SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (23903)3/9/1999 10:57:00 AM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Go Sprint Go>

Sprint racing MCI, AT&T Some analysts say the underdog is
a decent bet
The Kansas City Star

It's looking like a horse race for 100 between
[ Sprint Corp. ] , [ MCI ]

WorldCom and [ AT&T Corp. ]

All three long-distance giants outdistanced the
market last year and are looking impressive out
of the gate again. Caught up in the recent market
rally, each is now trading between $85 and $90 a share.

Market handicappers generally favor the competitive prospects of MCI and
AT&T, but most analysts still think Sprint is a decent bet.

In fact, some think the company looks cheap relative to competitors. Sprint
closed Monday at a new 52-week high of 89 3/4, up 2 5/16. The company
is trading at about 24 times estimated earnings for fiscal 1999. AT&T and
MCI have multiples of about 27 and 44, respectively.

On the other end of the spectrum, start-up long-distance company and
market darling [ Qwest Communications ] closed trading Monday with a
price-earnings multiple of 314.

''As long as Sprint trades at this multiple, it looks pretty attractive,'' said
Conrad Stuart of Deutsche Bank Securities, who has a buy rating on the
stock with a 12-month price target of $95.

Stuart cited the company's ability to sustain double-digit earnings growth in
the face of falling-long distance prices and said he expects earnings growth
to continue this year.

Sprint's lower price-earnings multiple relative to AT&T and MCI reflects
lower growth prospects and continued questions about its strategy for
entering local markets around the country, analysts said.

Both AT&T and MCI have invested billions to bypass the regional Bells and
deliver their own package of local telephone service and high-speed data
and Internet access to residential and business customers in major
metropolitan areas nationwide.

Sprint plans to deliver a similar service, called the Integrated On Demand
Network, or ION. But instead of building its own links directly to
customers, it hopes to deliver that service to customers by leasing access
lines from competitors.

That plan could be derailed by regulatory delays and reluctant competitors.
Also, analysts suspect Sprint's strategy might involve higher capital
expenditures than had been forecast, putting continued pressure on its
earnings.

Given those risks and the recent run-up in the company's stock price, Daniel
Reingold of Merrill Lynch says the company is fairly valued and gives it a
neutral rating.

Others see a merger in Sprint's future and are more enthusiastic.

At the very least, ''I think it can offer a better return than the market average
over the next few years,'' said Mel Martin, an analyst with Edward Jones in
St. Louis.