SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (52119)3/9/1999 2:03:00 PM
From: DRBES  Respond to of 1580445
 
re: "Name somebody who is better?"

You may be correct now. My last experience with one of their chipsets was their Atlantis motherboard. It was very vanilla and slow. However, you are correct it was very stable, but, it was slower than anything else that I had contact with at the time.

Regards,

DARBES



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (52119)3/9/1999 4:58:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580445
 
<All I know is that Intels chipsets are faster and less buggy than those made by Ali, VIA and SIS. At least initially, before revisions.>

And how many revisions will we need before the K7 chipsets are as stable as Xeon and Pentium III chipsets? Remember that AMD is betting the (Dresden) farm on the K7.

(Yeah yeah, problems in Xeon launch, but Intel wasn't betting the farm on Xeon.)

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News