Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FCL - FuelCell Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Adams who wrote (262)	3/18/1999 1:50:00 PM
From: Mark Adams	Respond to of 407

Quite a move thus far today. 25 thousand shares can move this puppy up $2? Wow.

To: Mark Adams who wrote (262)	4/11/1999 9:23:00 PM
From: Terry Lyon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 407

ERCs latest annual report suggests they have so many patents for molten carbonate as to virtually exclude the competition, as I recall. I see the United Technologies and now GLE.TO use solid oxide and claim great results. I wonder how molten carbonate stacks up against solid oxide for fuel cells. It also sounded like ERC had already conducted a lot of research with solid oxide before selecting molten carbonate. I also like MKTY, a patriotic thing, and like their connection to GE Power Systems as long as MKTY remains in the drivers seat. But I believe ERC has a definite advantage for efficiency, fuel diversity, and demonstrated operating life. I would like to hear others comments relative to molten carbonate versus solid oxide.