Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andreas who wrote (75915)	3/9/1999 4:41:00 PM
From: Duker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

INTC chips cause ED?!?! --Duker

To: Andreas who wrote (75915)	3/9/1999 5:49:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Andreas - Re: "I talked to a broker today who said that if the earnings warning does not materialize his firm will be busy thinking up a new rumor." Good joke ! However, David Tyce - The Prudent Bear - interviewed on CNBC at about 1:15 PM PDT, and William Fleckenshit are probably doing this right now. Paul

To: Andreas who wrote (75915)	3/9/1999 9:16:00 PM
From: John Meares	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Fact Brokers and MM cause "ED"

To: Andreas who wrote (75915)	3/11/1999 9:15:00 AM
From: Joseph Pareti	Respond to of 186894

it's funny to watch how ANALysts are steering world emotions around Intel. I am observing the same pattern as last year (unlike most of you I have a short experience as an Intel investor). As the quarter end nears, we hear lots of noise, see blood-letting on the street and at the end it invariably turns out that the INTEL numbers are spot on with Intel guidance. Kurlak didn't listen ... where is he now ? Someone came up with the low-end price war a few weeks ago ... Andy B. replied this is already factored in, and so on. I consider their ability to not only generate awesome profits, but also to be fully cognizant of their capability as the hallmark of excellence.