SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Caxton Rhodes who wrote (23950)3/9/1999 5:28:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
Caxton, Thats why Q came up with HDR. I for one think that statement was accurate,

Regards,

Michael



To: Caxton Rhodes who wrote (23950)3/9/1999 6:07:00 PM
From: Clarksterh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Although CDMA isn't the best technology for carrying big chunks of data, Qualcomm said it likely would be the cheapest and easiest system to deploy in 3G networks for the next couple of years.

????? This is a bizzarre statement. Are they saying that some other better technology may eventually come along? If so, I'll so stipulate. But if they mean that other technologies which are near the point of deployment are better, then I'd like to know what they are.

Are they saying that TDMA is better is a fixed line, no interference, situation. Again, I'll agree to that. So what?

The only thing that I know of that could eventually be a threat to CDMA in a cell system is some flavor of OFDM, but it is probably about where CDMA cell systems were in the late 80's, and by the time OFDM deploys in its first commercial cell system CDMA will probably be much closer to the theoretical limits.

Clark



To: Caxton Rhodes who wrote (23950)3/9/1999 9:17:00 PM
From: engineer  Respond to of 152472
 
Bull pucky......