Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (50982)	3/9/1999 5:49:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

I think I remember the discussion. You can't get direct info -- just ASPs and unit growth and negative follows from that, but I was thinking, allowing for some error -- at best they were flat. How far did you figure revenues were down over '97's?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (50982)	3/9/1999 5:54:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Mr. Avocado doesn't like data that don't fit his argument. Otherwise, perhaps he would have responded to #reply-8232479.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (50982)	3/9/1999 5:57:00 PM
From: Alohal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

And that's that! Figures, who needs figures? If MB says it's s0, why that's good enough for me!

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (50982)	3/9/1999 5:57:00 PM
From: Devil's Advocate	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

OK, so if you can't prove your point with data you turn to name calling ??? I'm sorry, but I'm on the wrong thread. I though we were debating and trying to establish the truth. But maybe I'm wrong.