SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (37539)3/10/1999 1:52:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Don't laugh. When a paid caller doing fund-raising for a certain conservative PAC telephoned me at home recently, the paid caller's script referred to "our pro-death oppenents". So delighted was I at their boldness, I agreed to send in a donation.

I know that in 1996, in the heart of the Christian Coalition Nat'l Convention, a man in the audience at a small "break-out session" was asking a question, referring the "pro-death" people. The speaker running the session admonished him to not use inflamatory language. That for our political objectives, that would be an unwise practice. I guess the soft-shoe approach has not worked, because look where Repubs are today (if we believe the polls).

I for one am ready to try a different approach.



To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (37539)3/10/1999 2:59:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Mr. Doe, you really are a case. I post data from the Gallup web site; Gallup is probably the most respected polling organization in the country, and is certainly non- partisan; I even provide a hyperlink so one can check it out for oneself. And yet you manage to dismiss it as "an Internet poll", which is simply untrue, and imply that Republicans are all manufacturing data (as part of the VRWC?), or are too stupid to know when they have been had. If only professional Democrats were as out of touch...