Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WallStreetTips who wrote (1578)	3/10/1999 10:58:00 AM
From: Susan G	Respond to of 28311

In at 55, Sold some yesterday at 84, now regretting it. I will be holding the rest as a long term hold no matter how high it goes. At least a 1 year hold. I will buy more on dips to trade. My first buy was at $18 - imagine If I held it all! Everytime I sell it goes up and never dips. GO GNET! IMO, a future Yahoo.

To: WallStreetTips who wrote (1578)	3/10/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: Jay Plummer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28311

WWW, You read my mind. Sold 65% of holdings at 91. Thought this run has come so far too fast. Will look to repurchase at 76. The analyst upgrading the internet bunch was the reason for my decision. Stock could still climb higher with announcement of the new advertising push. I did keep a few(free)shares. Still Long on GNET!! Jay

To: WallStreetTips who wrote (1578)	3/10/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: HeatherN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28311

WST, With current "strong buy" recs and only very recent analyst coverage of an internet company that is actually generating profits (from multiple sources such as advertising, subscriptions etc.), I am continuing to hold onto my GNET since my $18(split adjusted) entry. A national ad campaign begins this month, reminding us of the fact that GNET and it's components like SI have accomplished all this without all the media splash or analyst coverage that other companies have required. IMHO of course.