SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Lloyd who wrote (51227)3/10/1999 3:10:00 PM
From: Mike M2  Respond to of 132070
 
Don, thanks for the Intel report. Having witnessed years of Clinton speak i would observe that while it may be legally accurate the statement does not preclude them from issuing a statement in the future. also it depends on what you mean by 'are' or 'is' and plans -g-. BTW I'm not a lawyer -g- I think earlie has made a strong case for the possibility of a disappointing revenues. We shall see. Mike



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (51227)3/10/1999 3:11:00 PM
From: gbh  Respond to of 132070
 
Don, qotta love that wording. Doesn't make me very comfortable as an INTC holder <g>.

Gary



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (51227)3/10/1999 3:32:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin  Respond to of 132070
 
..so why hasn't the stock moved at all? Sheesh.



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (51227)3/10/1999 5:39:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
Don, I hate to admit it, but they may announce. That sounded like a cop-out for a co. that was showing cartoons lampooning the top chip analyst last quarter. And that ticked me off. Making fun of chip analysts is my bailiwick. <g>

MB


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News